Let’s Mock Draft Run a mock draft

NFL · 2026 Week 3

Week 3 Standard WR Rankings

Standard, 1QB · 141 players projected · updated September 22, 2026

See how our Week 2 rankings performed

Our Week 3 quarterback rankings are being corrected and are not shown. The board on this page was generated before a fix to how we model whether a quarterback plays at all, and it ranked several backups among the starters. Running backs, receivers and tight ends are unaffected and are current. No market snapshot: no sportsbook or prediction-market prices reached this board. Sportsbook prices reached 0 of 143 fantasy-relevant players (0%), so the market half of this board is thinner than a full week's.

How these rankings work

How these rankings are built

We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.

We then update those expectations for Week 3 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.

We then simulate the week 4,000 times and rank players by the projected fantasy points those simulations produce.

This board is priced in Standard. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.

What the percentages mean

For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.

Top 3
how often he finishes among the top three at his position
Top 12
how often he finishes in the top 12
Top 24
how often he finishes in the top 24

A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.

How often a strong start lasts

Since 1999, 42% of WRs inside the top 12 through Week 2 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 325 WR-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.

What stands out this week

141 WRs ranked for Week 3. Jaxon Smith-Njigba leads at 13.1 projected points.

Biggest differences from the draft market

Ahead

  • Stefon DiggsWR24Our projection is higher than the outside forecastTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 16% · Top 24: 31% +11 vs. WR35

Behind

  • Drake LondonWR16Our projection is lower than the outside forecastTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 17% · Top 24: 32% -9 vs. WR7
  • DJ MooreWR31Our projection is lower than the outside forecastTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 14% · Top 24: 27% -9 vs. WR22
  • Ja'Marr ChaseWR8Our projection is lower than the outside forecastTop 3: 8% · Top 12: 25% · Top 24: 42% -7 vs. WR1

Movement

Risers

  • Michael BandyWR26Top 3: 5% · Top 12: 17% · Top 24: 30% ↑ 92
  • Denzel BostonWR29Top 3: 4% · Top 12: 14% · Top 24: 28% ↑ 34
  • Tre TuckerWR36Top 3: 3% · Top 12: 13% · Top 24: 25% ↑ 34

Fallers

Positional movement since the final Week 2 board, among players inside WR36 either week. Players not ranked at their position then are excluded.

Week 3 Standard WR Rankings -- Standard scoring: projected fantasy points and the share of simulated weeks finishing top 3, top 12 and top 24 at the position. From our own statistical and market model, not analyst consensus.
# Pos Player Pos rank Proj
1 WR Jaxon Smith-NjigbaSEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 17% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 40%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR16 at the median, WR6 - WR41 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 17%Top 12: 44%Top 24: 60%
 WR1— 13.1
2 WR Amon-Ra St. BrownDET
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 15% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR19 at the median, WR7 - WR45 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR65 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 15%Top 12: 38%Top 24: 56%
 WR2↑ 1 12.2
3 WR Chris OlaveNOQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 52%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR26 at the median, WR8 - WR52 in the middle half, and WR3 - WR76 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 33%Top 24: 48%
 WR3↑ 3 11.3
4 WR CeeDee LambDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 54%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR29 at the median, WR10 - WR52 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 30%Top 24: 46%
 WR4↑ 4 10.4
5 WR Davante AdamsLAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR31 at the median, WR11 - WR54 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR76 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 44%
 WR5↑ 19 9.9
6 WR DeVonta SmithPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 57%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR11 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR76 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 27%Top 24: 43%
 WR6↑ 10 9.8
7 WR Christian WatsonGB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR12 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 27%Top 24: 44%
 WR7↑ 12 9.8
8 WR Ja'Marr ChaseCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 58%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR34 at the median, WR12 - WR57 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 25%Top 24: 42%
 WR8↓ 3 9.4
9 WR Tetairoa McMillanCAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR36 at the median, WR13 - WR57 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR78 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 39%
 WR9↑ 5 9.1
10 WR Justin JeffersonMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 60%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR35 at the median, WR13 - WR58 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 40%
 WR10↓ 6 9.1
11 WR Parker WashingtonJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 60%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR36 at the median, WR14 - WR59 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 40%
 WR11↑ 16 9.0
12 WR Garrett WilsonNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 63%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR38 at the median, WR15 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 20%Top 24: 37%
 WR12↑ 1 8.6
13 WR Tee HigginsCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR40 at the median, WR15 - WR61 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 35%
 WR13↑ 8 8.3
14 WR Jalen CokerCARQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR16 - WR69 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 20%Top 24: 35%
 WR14↑ 9 8.3
15 WR Malik NabersNYGQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR18 - WR74 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 18%Top 24: 32%
 WR15↓ 4 7.8
16 WR Drake LondonATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR43 at the median, WR18 - WR65 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR88 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 32%
 WR16↓ 7 7.7
17 WR George PickensDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR18 - WR68 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR92 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 32%
 WR17↓ 7 7.7
18 WR Jaylen WaddleDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR19 - WR65 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR88 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 31%
 WR18↑ 11 7.6
19 WR Matthew GoldenGB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR45 at the median, WR19 - WR66 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR89 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 30%
 WR19↑ 9 7.6
20 WR Ladd McConkeyLACQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR48 at the median, WR20 - WR76 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 30%
 WR20↓ 2 7.5
21 WR Devaughn VeleNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR20 - WR72 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 29%
 WR21↑ 12 7.4
22 WR Emeka EgbukaTB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR46 at the median, WR19 - WR70 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR94 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 31%
 WR22↓ 2 7.4
23 WR Rashee RiceKC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR20 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 30%
 WR23↓ 6 7.4
24 WR Stefon DiggsWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR46 at the median, WR20 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR97 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 31%
 WR24↑ 11 7.4
25 WR Casey WashingtonCAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR20 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 29%
 WR25NEW 7.3
26 WR Michael BandyDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR20 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 30%
 WR26↑ 92 7.3
27 WR DK MetcalfPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR48 at the median, WR20 - WR74 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 29%
 WR27↑ 3 7.2
28 WR Mike EvansSFQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR21 - WR81 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 15%Top 24: 28%
 WR28↓ 2 7.1
29 WR Denzel BostonCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR21 - WR73 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 28%
 WR29↑ 34 7.1
30 WR Terry McLaurinWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR22 - WR73 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 28%
 WR30↑ 4 7.0
31 WR DJ MooreBUFQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR52 at the median, WR22 - WR81 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 27%
 WR31↓ 16 6.9
32 WR Deebo Samuel Sr.SF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR22 - WR75 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 27%
 WR32↑ 5 6.9
33 WR Luther Burden IIICHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR24 - WR73 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR97 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 26%
 WR33↓ 8 6.8
34 WR Carnell TateTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR23 - WR74 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 26%
 WR34↓ 3 6.8
35 WR Jameson WilliamsDET
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR23 - WR76 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 27%
 WR35↓ 13 6.8
36 WR Tre TuckerLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 75%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR24 - WR75 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 25%
 WR36↑ 34 6.8
37 WR Dontayvion WicksPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 75%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR24 - WR77 in the middle half, and WR11 - WR98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 12%Top 24: 25%
 WR37↑ 18 6.6
38 WR Xavier WorthyKC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR55 at the median, WR24 - WR84 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 26%
 WR38↑ 5 6.4
39 WR Adonai MitchellNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 76%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR54 at the median, WR26 - WR79 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR102 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 24%
 WR39↑ 29 6.3
40 WR Rome OdunzeCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR54 at the median, WR26 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR11 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 23%
 WR40↓ 4 6.3
41 WR Mitchell TinsleyHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 76%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR58 at the median, WR26 - WR92 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR120 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 24%
 WR41NEW 6.3
42 WR Khalil ShakirBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR54 at the median, WR27 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 23%
 WR42↓ 4 6.3
43 WR Brian Thomas Jr.JAXQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR56 at the median, WR27 - WR86 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR115 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 23%
 WR43↑ 14 6.3
44 WR Courtland SuttonDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR57 at the median, WR26 - WR83 in the middle half, and WR11 - WR108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 23%
 WR44↓ 12 6.2
45 WR KC ConcepcionCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR53 at the median, WR27 - WR78 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 23%
 WR45↑ 2 6.2
46 WR Josh DownsIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR55 at the median, WR28 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 22%
 WR46↑ 12 6.1
47 WR Xavier HutchinsonHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR56 at the median, WR28 - WR82 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR106 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 22%
 WR47↑ 7 6.1
48 WR Romeo DoubsNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR55 at the median, WR29 - WR81 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR106 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 22%
 WR48↑ 14 6.0
49 WR Caleb DouglasMIAQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR60 at the median, WR30 - WR90 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR115 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 21%
 WR49↓ 7 6.0
50 WR Michael WilsonARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR56 at the median, WR29 - WR81 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 21%
 WR50↓ 10 6.0
51 WR Rashod BatemanBAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR58 at the median, WR28 - WR85 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 22%
 WR51↑ 35 5.9
52 WR Quentin JohnstonLAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR60 at the median, WR31 - WR87 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR110 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 20%
 WR52↓ 6 5.8
53 WR Rashid ShaheedSEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR59 at the median, WR31 - WR86 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 19%
 WR53↑ 22 5.7
54 WR Chris Godwin Jr.TB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR61 at the median, WR34 - WR87 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 19%
 WR54↓ 1 5.5
55 WR Keenan AllenIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR64 at the median, WR35 - WR90 in the middle half, and WR15 - WR113 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 8%Top 24: 18%
 WR55↑ 5 5.4
56 WR Malik WashingtonMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR62 at the median, WR37 - WR89 in the middle half, and WR16 - WR113 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 17%
 WR56↓ 5 5.3
57 WR Jalen McMillanTBQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR72 at the median, WR35 - WR110 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR140 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 18%
 WR57↑ 17 5.2
58 WR Keon ColemanBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR65 at the median, WR35 - WR92 in the middle half, and WR16 - WR116 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 17%
 WR58↑ 36 5.2
59 WR Jordan AddisonMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR65 at the median, WR35 - WR93 in the middle half, and WR16 - WR119 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 17%
 WR59↓ 11 5.2
60 WR Marvin Harrison Jr.ARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR67 at the median, WR36 - WR94 in the middle half, and WR16 - WR117 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 17%
 WR60↓ 10 5.2
61 WR Kalif RaymondCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR63 at the median, WR36 - WR88 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR61↓ 17 5.2
62 WR Alec PierceINDDDoubtful
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR67 at the median, WR38 - WR99 in the middle half, and WR16 - WR124 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR62↓ 23 5.1
63 WR Jayden ReedGBQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR73 at the median, WR38 - WR105 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR132 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR63↓ 18 4.9
64 WR Ted Hurst IIITB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR68 at the median, WR38 - WR96 in the middle half, and WR19 - WR121 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 15%
 WR64↑ 19 4.9
65 WR Jakobi MeyersJAXQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR74 at the median, WR40 - WR104 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR129 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR65↓ 1 4.8
66 WR Travis HunterJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR78 at the median, WR43 - WR110 in the middle half, and WR18 - WR138 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 14%
 WR66↑ 34 4.6
67 WR Wan'Dale RobinsonTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR72 at the median, WR44 - WR99 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR120 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 13%
 WR67↓ 26 4.6
68 WR Ryan FlournoyDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR75 at the median, WR43 - WR104 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR127 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 13%
 WR68↑ 8 4.5
69 WR Cooper KuppSEAQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR78 at the median, WR45 - WR109 in the middle half, and WR19 - WR134 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 14%
 WR69↑ 8 4.5
70 WR Malachi FieldsNYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR73 at the median, WR46 - WR102 in the middle half, and WR21 - WR125 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 13%
 WR70↑ 8 4.5
71 WR Tre HarrisLAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR72 at the median, WR45 - WR98 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR123 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 13%
 WR71↓ 2 4.5
72 WR DeMario DouglasNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR76 at the median, WR46 - WR104 in the middle half, and WR22 - WR127 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 12%
 WR72↓ 16 4.3
73 WR Jaylin NoelHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR77 at the median, WR48 - WR105 in the middle half, and WR22 - WR127 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 12%
 WR73↑ 17 4.3
74 WR Mack HollinsNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR79 at the median, WR49 - WR106 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR129 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 12%
 WR74↓ 13 4.2
75 WR Kendrick BourneARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR79 at the median, WR49 - WR105 in the middle half, and WR22 - WR128 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 12%
 WR75↓ 23 4.2
76 WR Jahan DotsonATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR79 at the median, WR49 - WR106 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR129 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR76↑ 8 4.2
77 WR Tory HortonSEAQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR90 at the median, WR49 - WR126 in the middle half, and WR19 - WR154 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 13%
 WR77NEW 4.1
78 WR Jerry JeudyCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR80 at the median, WR50 - WR106 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR130 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR78↓ 6 4.1
79 WR Antonio WilliamsWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR82 at the median, WR52 - WR108 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR131 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR79↓ 6 4.0
80 WR Kayshon BoutteHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR81 at the median, WR52 - WR108 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR132 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR80— 4.0
81 WR Danny GrayPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR89 at the median, WR52 - WR122 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR148 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR81NEW 3.9
82 WR Jalen TolbertMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR89 at the median, WR54 - WR122 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR148 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 11%
 WR82↑ 31 3.9
83 WR Odell Beckham Jr.NYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR88 at the median, WR51 - WR120 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR149 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR83↑ 32 3.9
84 WR Jalen ReagorMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR88 at the median, WR50 - WR122 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR149 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR84NEW 3.9
85 WR Calvin RidleyTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR84 at the median, WR53 - WR114 in the middle half, and WR25 - WR139 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 10%
 WR85↓ 3 3.9
86 WR Alex BachmanLAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR90 at the median, WR53 - WR123 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR149 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 11%
 WR86NEW 3.8
87 WR K.J. OsbornTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR90 at the median, WR54 - WR123 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR150 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 10%
 WR87↑ 25 3.8
88 WR Tyquan ThorntonKC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR85 at the median, WR54 - WR113 in the middle half, and WR26 - WR135 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR88↑ 13 3.8
89 WR Brandon JohnsonPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR91 at the median, WR53 - WR124 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR149 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR89NEW 3.8
90 WR Xavier LegetteCAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR88 at the median, WR57 - WR116 in the middle half, and WR25 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR90↓ 1 3.7
91 WR Makai LemonPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR88 at the median, WR56 - WR115 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR91↓ 25 3.7
92 WR Jalen NailorLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR85 at the median, WR56 - WR112 in the middle half, and WR26 - WR135 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR92↓ 25 3.7
93 WR Pat BryantDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR86 at the median, WR55 - WR115 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR93↓ 34 3.7
94 WR Josh PalmerBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR89 at the median, WR57 - WR115 in the middle half, and WR25 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10%
 WR94↑ 1 3.7
95 WR Xavier GipsonPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR93 at the median, WR55 - WR124 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR150 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR95NEW 3.7
96 WR Austin TrammellJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR92 at the median, WR56 - WR124 in the middle half, and WR25 - WR150 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 10%
 WR96NEW 3.7
97 WR Nick Westbrook-IkhineIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR92 at the median, WR54 - WR125 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR152 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 10%
 WR97NEW 3.7
98 WR Kevin Coleman Jr.MIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR90 at the median, WR55 - WR119 in the middle half, and WR26 - WR144 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR98↓ 1 3.6
99 WR Lil'Jordan HumphreyDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR90 at the median, WR56 - WR121 in the middle half, and WR26 - WR145 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR99NEW 3.6
100 WR Darnell MooneyNYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR88 at the median, WR58 - WR114 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR100↓ 13 3.6
101 WR Roman WilsonPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR91 at the median, WR59 - WR117 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR139 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 8%
 WR101↓ 36 3.5
102 WR Dyami BrownWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR92 at the median, WR59 - WR119 in the middle half, and WR28 - WR140 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 8%
 WR102↓ 6 3.5
103 WR Isaac TeSlaaDET
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR91 at the median, WR60 - WR118 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR140 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 8%
 WR103↓ 11 3.5
104 WR Jack BechLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR93 at the median, WR62 - WR121 in the middle half, and WR29 - WR143 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 8%
 WR104↓ 25 3.4
105 WR Dylan DrummondATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR98 at the median, WR60 - WR132 in the middle half, and WR28 - WR157 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 8%
 WR105NEW 3.4
106 WR Marquise BrownPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR98 at the median, WR63 - WR127 in the middle half, and WR29 - WR151 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 7%
 WR106↑ 4 3.3
107 WR Ricky White IIISEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR98 at the median, WR62 - WR130 in the middle half, and WR28 - WR157 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 8%
 WR107NEW 3.3
108 WR David MooreCAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR100 at the median, WR64 - WR131 in the middle half, and WR29 - WR157 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 7%
 WR108NEW 3.2
109 WR Isaiah WilliamsNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR97 at the median, WR68 - WR123 in the middle half, and WR32 - WR144 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 6%
 WR109↓ 7 3.1
110 WR Emmanuel Henderson Jr.SEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR105 at the median, WR66 - WR135 in the middle half, and WR30 - WR160 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 7%
 WR110↑ 1 3.1
111 WR Zavion ThomasCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR102 at the median, WR68 - WR131 in the middle half, and WR31 - WR153 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 6%
 WR111↑ 5 3.0
112 WR Chris BellMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR101 at the median, WR70 - WR126 in the middle half, and WR36 - WR147 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR112↓ 24 2.9
113 WR Theo Wease Jr.LAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR112 at the median, WR76 - WR143 in the middle half, and WR34 - WR169 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 5%
 WR113NEW 2.7
114 WR Germie BernardPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR117 at the median, WR85 - WR145 in the middle half, and WR40 - WR166 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR114NEW 2.4
115 WR Jahdae WalkerCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR122 at the median, WR89 - WR150 in the middle half, and WR38 - WR171 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR115NEW 2.4
116 WR Kevin Austin Jr.NO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR119 at the median, WR88 - WR147 in the middle half, and WR45 - WR170 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR116NEW 2.3
117 WR KaVontae TurpinDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR121 at the median, WR91 - WR146 in the middle half, and WR47 - WR166 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR117↓ 12 2.2
118 WR Elic AyomanorTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR124 at the median, WR94 - WR148 in the middle half, and WR43 - WR168 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR118↓ 19 2.2
119 WR Trey PalmerNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR128 at the median, WR95 - WR158 in the middle half, and WR43 - WR178 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR119NEW 2.1
120 WR Bryce OliverTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR130 at the median, WR97 - WR157 in the middle half, and WR46 - WR178 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR120↑ 2 2.1
121 WR Olamide ZaccheausATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR127 at the median, WR99 - WR151 in the middle half, and WR57 - WR171 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR121↓ 17 2.0
122 WR Kyle WilliamsNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR124 at the median, WR96 - WR149 in the middle half, and WR56 - WR168 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR122↓ 16 2.0
123 WR Darius CooperPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR128 at the median, WR100 - WR152 in the middle half, and WR58 - WR171 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR123NEW 2.0
124 WR Devontez WalkerBALQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR134 at the median, WR96 - WR162 in the middle half, and WR53 - WR183 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR124↓ 26 2.0
125 WR Ben SkowronekPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR127 at the median, WR97 - WR153 in the middle half, and WR57 - WR175 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR125NEW 2.0
126 WR Skyler BellBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR133 at the median, WR100 - WR161 in the middle half, and WR52 - WR181 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR126NEW 2.0
127 WR Chris MooreBAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR124 at the median, WR97 - WR150 in the middle half, and WR64 - WR169 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR127↓ 36 2.0
128 WR Andrei IosivasCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR128 at the median, WR101 - WR152 in the middle half, and WR63 - WR171 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR128↓ 43 1.9
129 WR Troy FranklinDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR127 at the median, WR99 - WR150 in the middle half, and WR64 - WR168 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR129NEW 1.9
130 WR Bryce LanceNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR130 at the median, WR103 - WR154 in the middle half, and WR64 - WR172 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR130↓ 49 1.9
131 WR Skyy MooreGB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR132 at the median, WR102 - WR155 in the middle half, and WR57 - WR174 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR131NEW 1.9
132 WR Cody WhiteLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR134 at the median, WR107 - WR157 in the middle half, and WR67 - WR175 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR132NEW 1.8
133 WR Bub MeansCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR141 at the median, WR108 - WR167 in the middle half, and WR64 - WR186 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR133NEW 1.8
134 WR Van JeffersonWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR139 at the median, WR105 - WR166 in the middle half, and WR60 - WR186 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR134↓ 25 1.8
135 WR Jared WayneHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR132 at the median, WR105 - WR155 in the middle half, and WR68 - WR174 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1%
 WR135NEW 1.8
136 WR Lewis BondHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR140 at the median, WR106 - WR167 in the middle half, and WR64 - WR187 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR136NEW 1.8
137 WR Tez JohnsonTB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR131 at the median, WR103 - WR154 in the middle half, and WR68 - WR172 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR137NEW 1.8
138 WR Gary JenningsLAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR140 at the median, WR107 - WR167 in the middle half, and WR62 - WR186 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR138NEW 1.8
139 WR Dillon BellMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR139 at the median, WR107 - WR167 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR187 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR139NEW 1.8
140 WR C.J. WilliamsJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR144 at the median, WR112 - WR171 in the middle half, and WR70 - WR190 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR140NEW 1.7
141 WR Brenen ThompsonLAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR142 at the median, WR111 - WR165 in the middle half, and WR68 - WR184 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1%
 WR141NEW 1.7

Simulated finishes

This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.

Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.

Week 3 WR outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.

Projected rank
Median finish
1361224366090
  1. WR1 Jaxon Smith-Njigba
    WR16
    Jaxon Smith-Njigba is ranked WR1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR16 at the median, WR6 - WR41 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR60 in the middle 80%.
  2. WR2 Amon-Ra St. Brown
    WR19
    Amon-Ra St. Brown is ranked WR2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR19 at the median, WR7 - WR45 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR65 in the middle 80%.
  3. WR3 Chris Olave
    WR26
    Chris Olave is ranked WR3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR26 at the median, WR8 - WR52 in the middle half, and WR3 - WR76 in the middle 80%.
  4. WR4 CeeDee Lamb
    WR29
    CeeDee Lamb is ranked WR4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR29 at the median, WR10 - WR52 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR73 in the middle 80%.
  5. WR5 Davante Adams
    WR31
    Davante Adams is ranked WR5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR31 at the median, WR11 - WR54 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR76 in the middle 80%.
  6. WR6 DeVonta Smith
    WR32
    DeVonta Smith is ranked WR6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR11 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR76 in the middle 80%.
  7. WR7 Christian Watson
    WR32
    Christian Watson is ranked WR7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR12 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR79 in the middle 80%.
  8. WR8 Ja'Marr Chase
    WR34
    Ja'Marr Chase is ranked WR8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR34 at the median, WR12 - WR57 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR79 in the middle 80%.
  9. WR9 Tetairoa McMillan
    WR36
    Tetairoa McMillan is ranked WR9 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR36 at the median, WR13 - WR57 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR78 in the middle 80%.
  10. WR10 Justin Jefferson
    WR35
    Justin Jefferson is ranked WR10 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR35 at the median, WR13 - WR58 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR81 in the middle 80%.
  11. WR11 Parker Washington
    WR36
    Parker Washington is ranked WR11 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR36 at the median, WR14 - WR59 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR81 in the middle 80%.
  12. WR12 Garrett Wilson
    WR38
    Garrett Wilson is ranked WR12 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR38 at the median, WR15 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR83 in the middle 80%.
  13. WR13 Tee Higgins
    WR40
    Tee Higgins is ranked WR13 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR40 at the median, WR15 - WR61 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR84 in the middle 80%.
  14. WR14 Jalen Coker
    WR42
    Jalen Coker is ranked WR14 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR16 - WR69 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  15. WR15 Malik Nabers
    WR47
    Malik Nabers is ranked WR15 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR18 - WR74 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
  16. WR16 Drake London
    WR43
    Drake London is ranked WR16 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR43 at the median, WR18 - WR65 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR88 in the middle 80%.
  17. WR17 George Pickens
    WR44
    George Pickens is ranked WR17 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR18 - WR68 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR92 in the middle 80%.
  18. WR18 Jaylen Waddle
    WR44
    Jaylen Waddle is ranked WR18 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR19 - WR65 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR88 in the middle 80%.
  19. WR19 Matthew Golden
    WR45
    Matthew Golden is ranked WR19 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR45 at the median, WR19 - WR66 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR89 in the middle 80%.
  20. WR20 Ladd McConkey
    WR48
    Ladd McConkey is ranked WR20 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR48 at the median, WR20 - WR76 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
  21. WR21 Devaughn Vele
    WR47
    Devaughn Vele is ranked WR21 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR20 - WR72 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR96 in the middle 80%.
  22. WR22 Emeka Egbuka
    WR46
    Emeka Egbuka is ranked WR22 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR46 at the median, WR19 - WR70 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR94 in the middle 80%.
  23. WR23 Rashee Rice
    WR47
    Rashee Rice is ranked WR23 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR20 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  24. WR24 Stefon Diggs
    WR46
    Stefon Diggs is ranked WR24 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR46 at the median, WR20 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR97 in the middle 80%.
Show WR25 - WR36
  1. WR25 Casey Washington
    WR49
    Casey Washington is ranked WR25 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR20 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR111 in the middle 80%.
  2. WR26 Michael Bandy
    WR50
    Michael Bandy is ranked WR26 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR20 - WR80 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR109 in the middle 80%.
  3. WR27 DK Metcalf
    WR48
    DK Metcalf is ranked WR27 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR48 at the median, WR20 - WR74 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR96 in the middle 80%.
  4. WR28 Mike Evans
    WR51
    Mike Evans is ranked WR28 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR21 - WR81 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR109 in the middle 80%.
  5. WR29 Denzel Boston
    WR49
    Denzel Boston is ranked WR29 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR21 - WR73 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR98 in the middle 80%.
  6. WR30 Terry McLaurin
    WR50
    Terry McLaurin is ranked WR30 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR22 - WR73 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR98 in the middle 80%.
  7. WR31 DJ Moore
    WR52
    DJ Moore is ranked WR31 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR52 at the median, WR22 - WR81 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR108 in the middle 80%.
  8. WR32 Deebo Samuel Sr.
    WR50
    Deebo Samuel Sr. is ranked WR32 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR22 - WR75 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
  9. WR33 Luther Burden III
    WR49
    Luther Burden III is ranked WR33 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR24 - WR73 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR97 in the middle 80%.
  10. WR34 Carnell Tate
    WR50
    Carnell Tate is ranked WR34 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR23 - WR74 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
  11. WR35 Jameson Williams
    WR50
    Jameson Williams is ranked WR35 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR23 - WR76 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR99 in the middle 80%.
  12. WR36 Tre Tucker
    WR50
    Tre Tucker is ranked WR36 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR24 - WR75 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR99 in the middle 80%.

Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.

The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.

How these are made

This board was built from 2026 usage for 68% of the board, draft position for 100%, an outside projection for 58%, an official status for 81%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Standard, 1QB.

Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured September 22, 2026 18:57 UTC. Movement is previous - current; positive means the player moved up the board (a smaller rank number), measured in positional rank against the final Week 2 board generated before that week's first kickoff (September 17, 2026). Model rankings-v1.3.0, board captured 2026-09-22.

LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.

LMD Rankings, rankings-v1.3.0. Inputs: Ball Don't Lie (fantasy market, player status, projections).

Browse every player page