NFL · 2026 Week 9
Week 9 Standard QB Rankings
Standard, 1QB · 36 players projected · updated November 8, 2026
See how our Week 8 rankings performed
Generated after the period's first kickoff (2026-11-06T01:15:00.000Z); this board is not a clean pregame record for games already played.
How these rankings work
How these rankings are built
We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.
We then update those expectations for Week 9 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.
We then simulate the week 4,000 times. The projected fantasy points those simulations produce set the order and the tiers.
This board is priced in Standard. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.
How the tiers work
Players are grouped into tiers at each position by projected fantasy points. A new tier starts where the projections separate, not after a set number of players, so tiers vary in size and a player who stands apart can be a tier on his own.
The breaks come from the best grouping of each position's projections, the method behind Jenks natural breaks, with gaps judged against how widely weekly scores vary at that position. The rule is the same every week and nobody places players by hand.
Within a tier, players are listed by projected points, but the gaps between them are small. They shouldn't decide a start/sit on their own.
A tier's band is the range of its players' projected points. It isn't a range of outcomes.
A player's 80% range is the middle of his simulated scores: the model puts 10% of outcomes below it and 10% above. Real scores can land outside it.
Players in neighbouring tiers often have overlapping ranges. A higher tier means more projected points, not a guarantee of outscoring everyone below it.
What the percentages mean
For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.
- Top 3
- how often he finishes among the top three at his position
- Top 12
- how often he finishes in the top 12
- Top 24
- how often he finishes in the top 24
A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.
How often a strong start lasts
Since 1999, 77% of QBs inside the top 12 through Week 8 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 324 QB-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.
What stands out this week
36 QBs in 9 tiers for Week 9. Joe Burrow leads at 20.2 projected points.
Tiers break where projected points separate, and the differences inside a tier are small. Each 80% range is the middle 80% of that player's simulated scores; real scores can fall outside it.
| Pos | Player | Proj | Outcome profile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 19.0 - 20.2 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Joe BurrowCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 22% of the time, 4th to 12th 39%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 11%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB9 at the median, QB4 - QB17 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB25 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 22%Top 12: 61%Top 24: 89% 80% range: 7.8 - 33.6 |
20.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 22% of the time, 4th to 12th 39%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 11%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB9 at the median, QB4 - QB17 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB25 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Brock PurdySF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 21% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 30%, and outside the top 24 12%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB10 at the median, QB4 - QB18 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB25 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 21%Top 12: 58%Top 24: 88% 80% range: 7.5 - 33.2 |
19.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 21% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 30%, and outside the top 24 12%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB10 at the median, QB4 - QB18 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB25 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Josh AllenBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 33%, and outside the top 24 12%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB11 at the median, QB5 - QB19 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB26 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 19%Top 12: 55%Top 24: 88% 80% range: 7.3 - 32.3 |
19.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 33%, and outside the top 24 12%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB11 at the median, QB5 - QB19 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB26 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 2 16.7 - 18.2 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Patrick MahomesKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 33%, and outside the top 24 13%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB11 at the median, QB5 - QB19 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB26 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 16%Top 12: 54%Top 24: 87% 80% range: 7.0 - 30.9 |
18.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 33%, and outside the top 24 13%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB11 at the median, QB5 - QB19 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB26 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Drake MayeNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 34%, and outside the top 24 14%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB12 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 14%Top 12: 52%Top 24: 86% 80% range: 6.8 - 29.8 |
17.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 34%, and outside the top 24 14%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB12 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Jayden DanielsWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 36%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 14%Top 12: 49%Top 24: 84% 80% range: 6.2 - 30.4 |
17.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 36%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Dak PrescottDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 37%, and outside the top 24 14%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 50%Top 24: 86% 80% range: 6.8 - 29.1 |
17.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 37%, and outside the top 24 14%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Jared GoffDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 37%, and outside the top 24 15%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 48%Top 24: 85% 80% range: 6.5 - 29.7 |
17.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 37%, and outside the top 24 15%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Trevor LawrenceJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 35%, and outside the top 24 18%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB7 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 47%Top 24: 82% 80% range: 5.3 - 29.7 |
16.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 35%, and outside the top 24 18%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB7 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB28 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 3 15.1 - 16.3 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Caleb WilliamsCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 38%, and outside the top 24 17%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB7 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 12%Top 12: 45%Top 24: 83% 80% range: 6.0 - 28.4 |
16.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 38%, and outside the top 24 17%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB7 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB28 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Jordan LoveGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 39%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB7 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 45%Top 24: 84% 80% range: 6.5 - 27.9 |
16.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 39%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB7 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | C.J. StroudHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 40%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB8 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 44%Top 24: 84% 80% range: 6.3 - 27.3 |
16.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 40%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB8 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Matthew StaffordLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 41%, and outside the top 24 17%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 42%Top 24: 83% 80% range: 6.2 - 26.2 |
15.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 41%, and outside the top 24 17%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Tyler ShoughNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 39%, and outside the top 24 19%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 42%Top 24: 81% 80% range: 5.9 - 26.6 |
15.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 39%, and outside the top 24 19%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB28 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Malik WillisMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 41%, and outside the top 24 18%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 41%Top 24: 82% 80% range: 5.8 - 26.6 |
15.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 41%, and outside the top 24 18%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Kirk CousinsLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 42%, and outside the top 24 18%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 40%Top 24: 82% 80% range: 6.2 - 26.6 |
15.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 42%, and outside the top 24 18%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Bryce YoungCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 42%, and outside the top 24 20%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB16 at the median, QB9 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 38%Top 24: 80% 80% range: 5.7 - 26.2 |
15.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 42%, and outside the top 24 20%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB16 at the median, QB9 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB28 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 4 13.8 - 14.6 projected points | |||||||
| QB | J.J. McCarthyNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 40%, and outside the top 24 24%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB9 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 36%Top 24: 76% 80% range: 4.5 - 26.5 |
14.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 40%, and outside the top 24 24%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB9 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB29 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Bo NixDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 43%, and outside the top 24 21%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB16 at the median, QB10 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 36%Top 24: 79% 80% range: 5.5 - 25.0 |
14.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 43%, and outside the top 24 21%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB16 at the median, QB10 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB28 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Michael Penix Jr.ATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 43%, and outside the top 24 24%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB10 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 33%Top 24: 76% 80% range: 4.9 - 24.9 |
14.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 43%, and outside the top 24 24%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB10 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB29 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Geno SmithNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 46%, and outside the top 24 22%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB11 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB6 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 31%Top 24: 78% 80% range: 5.4 - 23.6 |
13.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 46%, and outside the top 24 22%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB11 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB6 - QB28 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 5 11.8 - 13.2 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Carson WentzMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 40%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB19 at the median, QB11 - QB26 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB30 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 69% 80% range: 3.8 - 24.7 |
13.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 40%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB19 at the median, QB11 - QB26 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB30 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Daniel JonesIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 46%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB19 at the median, QB12 - QB25 in the middle half, and QB7 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 27%Top 24: 73% 80% range: 4.6 - 21.8 |
12.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 46%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB19 at the median, QB12 - QB25 in the middle half, and QB7 - QB29 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Justin HerbertLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 48%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB20 at the median, QB13 - QB25 in the middle half, and QB7 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 71% 80% range: 4.9 - 21.0 |
12.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 48%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB20 at the median, QB13 - QB25 in the middle half, and QB7 - QB29 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Deshaun WatsonCLEQQuestionable · projection includes a 71% chance of playing Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 32%, and outside the top 24 39%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB20 at the median, QB11 - QB78 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 61% 80% range: 0.0 - 24.9 |
11.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 32%, and outside the top 24 39%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB20 at the median, QB11 - QB78 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB80 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 6 8.8 - 10.4 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Gardner Minshew IIARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 41%, and outside the top 24 43%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB23 at the median, QB16 - QB28 in the middle half, and QB9 - QB30 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 57% 80% range: 3.3 - 19.2 |
10.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 41%, and outside the top 24 43%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB23 at the median, QB16 - QB28 in the middle half, and QB9 - QB30 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Jalen MilroeSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
SEA starter not confirmed: Jalen Milroe or Adrian Martinez · projection includes a 50% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 60%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB34 at the median, QB14 - QB66 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 22%Top 24: 40% 80% range: 0.0 - 25.4 |
8.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 60%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB34 at the median, QB14 - QB66 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB67 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 7 5.6 - 7.2 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Jacoby BrissettBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
BAL starter not confirmed: Jacoby Brissett or Joe Fagnano · projection includes a 50% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB63 at the median, QB17 - QB66 in the middle half, and QB8 - QB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 38% 80% range: 0.0 - 20.3 |
7.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB63 at the median, QB17 - QB66 in the middle half, and QB8 - QB67 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Baker MayfieldTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
TB starter not confirmed: Baker Mayfield or Jalon Daniels · projection includes a 50% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB64 at the median, QB19 - QB68 in the middle half, and QB10 - QB69 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 36% 80% range: 0.0 - 18.8 |
6.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB64 at the median, QB19 - QB68 in the middle half, and QB10 - QB69 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Joe Milton IIIPHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
PHI starter not confirmed: Joe Milton III or Tanner McKee · projection includes a 50% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB37 at the median, QB22 - QB54 in the middle half, and QB13 - QB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 30% 80% range: 0.0 - 16.3 |
5.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB37 at the median, QB22 - QB54 in the middle half, and QB13 - QB56 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Adrian MartinezSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
SEA starter not confirmed: Jalen Milroe or Adrian Martinez · projection includes a 45% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB77 at the median, QB23 - QB79 in the middle half, and QB11 - QB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 27% 80% range: 0.0 - 17.7 |
5.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB77 at the median, QB23 - QB79 in the middle half, and QB11 - QB79 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 8 3.7 - 4.5 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Tanner McKeePHIQQuestionable · projection includes a 71% chance of playing Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB60 at the median, QB26 - QB62 in the middle half, and QB12 - QB63 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 22% 80% range: 0.0 - 16.3 |
4.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB60 at the median, QB26 - QB62 in the middle half, and QB12 - QB63 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Joe FagnanoBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
BAL starter not confirmed: Jacoby Brissett or Joe Fagnano · projection includes a 45% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB78 at the median, QB26 - QB79 in the middle half, and QB17 - QB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 22% 80% range: 0.0 - 13.2 |
4.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB78 at the median, QB26 - QB79 in the middle half, and QB17 - QB80 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Jalon DanielsTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
TB starter not confirmed: Baker Mayfield or Jalon Daniels · projection includes a 45% chance of starting
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB41 at the median, QB26 - QB45 in the middle half, and QB17 - QB46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 21% 80% range: 0.0 - 12.8 |
4.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB41 at the median, QB26 - QB45 in the middle half, and QB17 - QB46 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| QB | Shedeur SandersCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB80 at the median, QB29 - QB80 in the middle half, and QB15 - QB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 8%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 0.0 - 14.3 |
3.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB80 at the median, QB29 - QB80 in the middle half, and QB15 - QB81 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 9 2.3 projected points | |||||||
| QB | Cole PaytonPHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB81 at the median, QB80 - QB81 in the middle half, and QB24 - QB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 10% 80% range: 0.0 - 8.3 |
2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB81 at the median, QB80 - QB81 in the middle half, and QB24 - QB81 in the middle 80%. | ||||
Simulated finishes
This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.
Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.
Week 9 QB outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.
-
Tier 1 Joe BurrowQB9Joe Burrow is in Tier 1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB9 at the median, QB4 - QB17 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB25 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 1 Brock PurdyQB10Brock Purdy is in Tier 1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB10 at the median, QB4 - QB18 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB25 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 1 Josh AllenQB11Josh Allen is in Tier 1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB11 at the median, QB5 - QB19 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB26 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Patrick MahomesQB11Patrick Mahomes is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB11 at the median, QB5 - QB19 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB26 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Drake MayeQB12Drake Maye is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB12 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Jayden DanielsQB13Jayden Daniels is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB2 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Dak PrescottQB13Dak Prescott is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Jared GoffQB13Jared Goff is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB6 - QB20 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Trevor LawrenceQB13Trevor Lawrence is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB13 at the median, QB7 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Caleb WilliamsQB14Caleb Williams is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB7 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Jordan LoveQB14Jordan Love is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB7 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 C.J. StroudQB14C.J. Stroud is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB14 at the median, QB8 - QB21 in the middle half, and QB3 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Matthew StaffordQB15Matthew Stafford is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Tyler ShoughQB15Tyler Shough is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Malik WillisQB15Malik Willis is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Kirk CousinsQB15Kirk Cousins is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB15 at the median, QB8 - QB22 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB27 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Bryce YoungQB16Bryce Young is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB16 at the median, QB9 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 J.J. McCarthyQB17J.J. McCarthy is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB9 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB4 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Bo NixQB16Bo Nix is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB16 at the median, QB10 - QB23 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Michael Penix Jr.QB17Michael Penix Jr. is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB10 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Geno SmithQB17Geno Smith is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB17 at the median, QB11 - QB24 in the middle half, and QB6 - QB28 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Carson WentzQB19Carson Wentz is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB19 at the median, QB11 - QB26 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB30 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Daniel JonesQB19Daniel Jones is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB19 at the median, QB12 - QB25 in the middle half, and QB7 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Justin HerbertQB20Justin Herbert is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB20 at the median, QB13 - QB25 in the middle half, and QB7 - QB29 in the middle 80%.
Show QB25 - QB36
-
Tier 5 Deshaun WatsonQB20Deshaun Watson is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB20 at the median, QB11 - QB78 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB80 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Gardner Minshew IIQB23Gardner Minshew II is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB23 at the median, QB16 - QB28 in the middle half, and QB9 - QB30 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Jalen MilroeQB34Jalen Milroe is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB34 at the median, QB14 - QB66 in the middle half, and QB5 - QB67 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Jacoby BrissettQB63Jacoby Brissett is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB63 at the median, QB17 - QB66 in the middle half, and QB8 - QB67 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Baker MayfieldQB64Baker Mayfield is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB64 at the median, QB19 - QB68 in the middle half, and QB10 - QB69 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Joe Milton IIIQB37Joe Milton III is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB37 at the median, QB22 - QB54 in the middle half, and QB13 - QB56 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Adrian MartinezQB77Adrian Martinez is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB77 at the median, QB23 - QB79 in the middle half, and QB11 - QB79 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 8 Tanner McKeeQB60Tanner McKee is in Tier 8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB60 at the median, QB26 - QB62 in the middle half, and QB12 - QB63 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 8 Joe FagnanoQB78Joe Fagnano is in Tier 8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB78 at the median, QB26 - QB79 in the middle half, and QB17 - QB80 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 8 Jalon DanielsQB41Jalon Daniels is in Tier 8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB41 at the median, QB26 - QB45 in the middle half, and QB17 - QB46 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 8 Shedeur SandersQB80Shedeur Sanders is in Tier 8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB80 at the median, QB29 - QB80 in the middle half, and QB15 - QB81 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 9 Cole PaytonQB81Cole Payton is in Tier 9 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes QB81 at the median, QB80 - QB81 in the middle half, and QB24 - QB81 in the middle 80%.
Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.
The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.
How these are made
This board was built from 2026 usage for 79% of the board, draft position for 99%, an outside projection for 56%, sportsbook props for 66%, an official status for 82%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Standard, 1QB.
Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured November 8, 2026 11:57 UTC. Model rankings-v1.5.2, board captured 2026-11-08.
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
