NFL · 2026 Week 5
Week 5 RB Rankings
Half PPR, 1QB · 99 players projected · updated October 8, 2026
How these rankings work
How these rankings are built
We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.
We then update those expectations for Week 5 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.
We then simulate the week 4,000 times and rank players by the projected fantasy points those simulations produce.
This board is priced in Half PPR. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.
What the percentages mean
For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.
- Top 3
- how often he finishes among the top three at his position
- Top 12
- how often he finishes in the top 12
- Top 24
- how often he finishes in the top 24
A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.
How often a strong start lasts
Since 1999, 62% of RBs inside the top 12 through Week 4 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 325 RB-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.
What stands out this week
99 RBs ranked for Week 5. Jahmyr Gibbs leads at 20.5 projected points.
Tier breaks
2.0 projected points separate RB1 Jahmyr Gibbs from RB2 Bijan Robinson.
2.1 projected points separate RB2 Bijan Robinson from RB3 Jonathan Taylor.
Biggest differences from the draft market
Ahead
- Emanuel WilsonRB20Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 24% · Top 24: 50% +29 vs. RB49
- Braelon AllenRB23Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 3% · Top 12: 21% · Top 24: 45% +27 vs. RB50
- Will ShipleyRB38Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 1% · Top 12: 10% · Top 24: 27% +26 vs. RB64
Behind
- Omarion HamptonRB22Sportsbooks pricing him below our baselineTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 21% · Top 24: 47% -11 vs. RB11
- Jeremiyah LoveRB17Sportsbooks pricing him below our baseline and our projection is lower than the outside forecastTop 3: 7% · Top 12: 28% · Top 24: 52% -5 vs. RB12
- James CookRB9Sportsbooks pricing him below our baselineTop 3: 13% · Top 12: 44% · Top 24: 70% -4 vs. RB5
Movement
Risers
- Emanuel WilsonRB20Top 3: 4% · Top 12: 24% · Top 24: 50% ↑ 21
- Keaton MitchellRB36Top 3: 1% · Top 12: 10% · Top 24: 26% ↑ 17
- Kyren WilliamsRB6Top 3: 13% · Top 12: 46% · Top 24: 71% ↑ 11
Fallers
- Jeremiyah LoveRB17Top 3: 7% · Top 12: 28% · Top 24: 52% ↓ 5
- D'Andre SwiftRB14Top 3: 9% · Top 12: 33% · Top 24: 58% ↓ 4
- Cam SkatteboRB16Top 3: 8% · Top 12: 29% · Top 24: 53% ↓ 3
Positional movement since the final Week 4 board, among players inside RB36 either week. Players not ranked at their position then are excluded.
| # | Pos | Player | Pos rank | Proj | Outcome profile | Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RB | Jahmyr GibbsDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 29% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 13%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB7 at the median, RB3 - RB16 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 29%Top 12: 66%Top 24: 87% |
RB1— | 20.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 29% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 13%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB7 at the median, RB3 - RB16 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB27 in the middle 80%. | |
| 2 | RB | Bijan RobinsonATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 23% of the time, 4th to 12th 39%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB9 at the median, RB4 - RB19 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB30 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 23%Top 12: 62%Top 24: 84% |
RB2— | 18.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 23% of the time, 4th to 12th 39%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB9 at the median, RB4 - RB19 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB30 in the middle 80%. | |
| 3 | RB | Jonathan TaylorIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 18% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 23%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 18%Top 12: 52%Top 24: 77% |
RB3↑ 1 | 16.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 18% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 23%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%. | |
| 4 | RB | Derrick HenryBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 17% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 25%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB25 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 17%Top 12: 51%Top 24: 75% |
RB4↓ 1 | 16.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 17% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 25%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB25 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | |
| 5 | RB | Christian McCaffreySF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 14%Top 12: 47%Top 24: 73% |
RB5↑ 1 | 15.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | |
| 6 | RB | Kyren WilliamsLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 46%Top 24: 71% |
RB6↑ 11 | 14.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | |
| 7 | RB | Ashton JeantyLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 12%Top 12: 43%Top 24: 71% |
RB7↑ 1 | 14.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | |
| 8 | RB | Chase BrownCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 12%Top 12: 44%Top 24: 71% |
RB8↑ 1 | 14.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 29%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | |
| 9 | RB | James CookBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 44%Top 24: 70% |
RB9↓ 2 | 14.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%. | |
| 10 | RB | Javonte WilliamsDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB40 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 12%Top 12: 43%Top 24: 70% |
RB10↑ 6 | 14.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB40 in the middle 80%. | |
| 11 | RB | Aaron JonesMINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 38%Top 24: 63% |
RB11↑ 3 | 13.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | |
| 12 | RB | Jaylen WarrenPITQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 36%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 38%Top 24: 64% |
RB12↓ 1 | 13.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 36%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | |
| 13 | RB | Quinshon JudkinsCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 38%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 34%Top 24: 62% |
RB13↑ 8 | 12.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 38%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%. | |
| 14 | RB | D'Andre SwiftCHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB9 - RB36 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 33%Top 24: 58% |
RB14↓ 4 | 12.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB9 - RB36 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB46 in the middle 80%. | |
| 15 | RB | Bhayshul TutenJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 43%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB11 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 30%Top 24: 57% |
RB15↑ 5 | 11.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 43%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB11 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB44 in the middle 80%. | |
| 16 | RB | Cam SkatteboNYGQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 47%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB10 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 53% |
RB16↓ 3 | 11.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 47%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB10 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | |
| 17 | RB | Jeremiyah LoveARIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 52% |
RB17↓ 5 | 11.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%. | |
| 18 | RB | Bucky IrvingTBQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 26%Top 24: 51% |
RB18— | 10.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%. | |
| 19 | RB | Rhamondre StevensonNEQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 26%Top 24: 51% |
RB19↑ 8 | 10.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB50 in the middle 80%. | |
| 20 | RB | Emanuel WilsonSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 50% |
RB20↑ 21 | 10.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | |
| 21 | RB | Tony PollardTENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 55%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB14 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 45% |
RB21↑ 3 | 9.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 55%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB14 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB52 in the middle 80%. | |
| 22 | RB | Omarion HamptonLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB14 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 47% |
RB22— | 9.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB14 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB50 in the middle 80%. | |
| 23 | RB | Braelon AllenNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 55%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB15 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 45% |
RB23↑ 5 | 9.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 55%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB15 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB49 in the middle 80%. | |
| 24 | RB | TreVeyon HendersonNEQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 58%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB15 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 42% |
RB24↑ 5 | 9.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 58%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB15 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB55 in the middle 80%. | |
| 25 | RB | David MontgomeryHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 57%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB16 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 19%Top 24: 43% |
RB25↓ 2 | 9.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 57%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB16 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB51 in the middle 80%. | |
| 26 | RB | Ollie Gordon IIMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 60%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 40% |
RB26↑ 11 | 8.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 60%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB55 in the middle 80%. | |
| 27 | RB | Jacory Croskey-MerrittWASQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 39% |
RB27↓ 2 | 8.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB56 in the middle 80%. | |
| 28 | RB | Alvin KamaraNOQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB57 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 18%Top 24: 38% |
RB28↓ 2 | 8.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB57 in the middle 80%. | |
| 29 | RB | RJ HarveyDENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB57 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 38% |
RB29↑ 3 | 8.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB57 in the middle 80%. | |
| 30 | RB | J.K. DobbinsDENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 63%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB18 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB57 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 37% |
RB30— | 8.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 63%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB18 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB57 in the middle 80%. | |
| 31 | RB | Brian RobinsonATLQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 67%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB19 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 33% |
RB31↑ 9 | 7.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 67%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB19 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | |
| 32 | RB | MarShawn LloydGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB21 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 32% |
RB32↑ 11 | 7.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB21 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB56 in the middle 80%. | |
| 33 | RB | Rachaad WhiteWASQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB21 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB11 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 12%Top 24: 31% |
RB33↑ 2 | 7.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB21 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB11 - RB63 in the middle 80%. | |
| 34 | RB | Rico DowdlePITQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB22 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 28% |
RB34NEW | 7.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB22 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB67 in the middle 80%. | |
| 35 | RB | Blake CorumLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB22 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 28% |
RB35↓ 1 | 6.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB22 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB58 in the middle 80%. | |
| 36 | RB | Keaton MitchellLACQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 26% |
RB36↑ 17 | 6.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | |
| 37 | RB | Tyler AllgeierARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 27% |
RB37↑ 5 | 6.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB60 in the middle 80%. | |
| 38 | RB | Will ShipleyPHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB23 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 27% |
RB38↑ 28 | 6.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB23 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB63 in the middle 80%. | |
| 39 | RB | Woody MarksHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB41 at the median, RB24 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB14 - RB61 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 8%Top 24: 26% |
RB39↓ 3 | 6.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB41 at the median, RB24 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB14 - RB61 in the middle 80%. | |
| 40 | RB | Kenny GainwellTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB42 at the median, RB26 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB15 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 23% |
RB40↓ 2 | 6.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB42 at the median, RB26 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB15 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | |
| 41 | RB | Kaleb JohnsonGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB33 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 17% |
RB41↑ 9 | 5.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB33 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | |
| 42 | RB | Mike Washington Jr.LV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB35 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB69 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 15% |
RB42↑ 16 | 4.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB35 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB69 in the middle 80%. | |
| 43 | RB | George HolaniSEAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB34 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB75 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 16% |
RB43↑ 14 | 4.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB34 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB75 in the middle 80%. | |
| 44 | RB | Chris Rodriguez Jr.JAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB34 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 16% |
RB44↑ 8 | 4.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB34 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB73 in the middle 80%. | |
| 45 | RB | Kendre MillerNOQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB35 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 15% |
RB45↓ 6 | 4.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB35 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | |
| 46 | RB | Tyjae SpearsTENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB35 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB74 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 14% |
RB46— | 4.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB35 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB74 in the middle 80%. | |
| 47 | RB | Najee HarrisNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB52 at the median, RB38 - RB64 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB75 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 12% |
RB47↑ 1 | 4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB52 at the median, RB38 - RB64 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB75 in the middle 80%. | |
| 48 | RB | Jaylen WrightMIAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB37 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 14% |
RB48↑ 12 | 4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB37 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB81 in the middle 80%. | |
| 49 | RB | Kaelon BlackSFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB39 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 13% |
RB49↓ 2 | 4.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB39 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB80 in the middle 80%. | |
| 50 | RB | Samaje PerineCINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB41 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% |
RB50↑ 5 | 4.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB41 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB81 in the middle 80%. | |
| 51 | RB | Raheim SandersCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB43 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB75 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 8% |
RB51↑ 5 | 3.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB43 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB75 in the middle 80%. | |
| 52 | RB | Ty JohnsonBUFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB45 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB89 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% |
RB52↑ 7 | 3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB45 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB89 in the middle 80%. | |
| 53 | RB | Justice HillBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB46 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB28 - RB78 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 7% |
RB53↑ 1 | 3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB46 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB28 - RB78 in the middle 80%. | |
| 54 | RB | Devin SingletaryNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB46 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 8% |
RB54↑ 14 | 3.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB46 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB84 in the middle 80%. | |
| 55 | RB | Kimani VidalLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB48 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB28 - RB84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 7% |
RB55↑ 16 | 3.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB48 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB28 - RB84 in the middle 80%. | |
| 56 | RB | Tyler GoodsonDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB66 at the median, RB51 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB90 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% |
RB56↑ 7 | 3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB66 at the median, RB51 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB90 in the middle 80%. | |
| 57 | RB | Michael BurtonCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB65 at the median, RB50 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB30 - RB92 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% |
RB57NEW | 3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB65 at the median, RB50 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB30 - RB92 in the middle 80%. | |
| 58 | RB | Sione VakiDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB53 - RB75 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB85 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB58↑ 7 | 2.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB53 - RB75 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB85 in the middle 80%. | |
| 59 | RB | Seth McGowanIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB68 at the median, RB55 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB90 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% |
RB59↑ 33 | 2.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB68 at the median, RB55 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB90 in the middle 80%. | |
| 60 | RB | Isaiah DavisNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB72 at the median, RB58 - RB84 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB60↓ 9 | 2.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB72 at the median, RB58 - RB84 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB95 in the middle 80%. | |
| 61 | RB | Emari DemercadoDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB57 - RB85 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 5% |
RB61NEW | 2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB57 - RB85 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB96 in the middle 80%. | |
| 62 | RB | Dameon PiercePHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB58 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB37 - RB100 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 4% |
RB62NEW | 2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB58 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB37 - RB100 in the middle 80%. | |
| 63 | RB | Lan LarisonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB62 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% |
RB63↑ 16 | 2.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB62 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | |
| 64 | RB | Amar JohnsonLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB79 at the median, RB62 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% |
RB64↑ 31 | 2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB79 at the median, RB62 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB105 in the middle 80%. | |
| 65 | RB | Frank Gore Jr.BUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB60 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB102 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB65NEW | 2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB60 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB102 in the middle 80%. | |
| 66 | RB | Robert Henry Jr.WAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB81 at the median, RB63 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% |
RB66NEW | 2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB81 at the median, RB63 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB107 in the middle 80%. | |
| 67 | RB | Tyler BadieDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB61 - RB86 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB67↑ 5 | 2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB61 - RB86 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB96 in the middle 80%. | |
| 68 | RB | Carlos WashingtonMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB62 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB35 - RB106 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% |
RB68NEW | 2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB62 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB35 - RB106 in the middle 80%. | |
| 69 | RB | Dare OgunbowaleLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB65 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB106 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% |
RB69↑ 16 | 2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB65 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB106 in the middle 80%. | |
| 70 | RB | Evan HullARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB65 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% |
RB70NEW | 2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB65 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | |
| 71 | RB | Corey KinerNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB66 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB71↑ 7 | 2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB66 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB99 in the middle 80%. | |
| 72 | RB | Kalel MullingsTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB65 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB72↓ 28 | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB65 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | |
| 73 | RB | Eric GrayCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB66 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% |
RB73↑ 9 | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB66 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | |
| 74 | RB | Kendall MiltonCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB66 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB74NEW | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB66 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB107 in the middle 80%. | |
| 75 | RB | CJ DonaldsonNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB66 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB75↑ 18 | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB66 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB99 in the middle 80%. | |
| 76 | RB | Jordan JamesSF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB67 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB76NEW | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB67 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB105 in the middle 80%. | |
| 77 | RB | Ray DavisBUFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB64 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB77↓ 2 | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB64 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | |
| 78 | RB | Jarquez HunterMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB66 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB78NEW | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB66 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | |
| 79 | RB | Carson SteelePHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB66 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB79↓ 34 | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB66 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | |
| 80 | RB | Cody SchraderDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB67 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB80↑ 1 | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB67 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | |
| 81 | RB | Pierre StrongGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB67 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB81NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB67 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | |
| 82 | RB | Nicholas SingletonTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB70 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2% |
RB82NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB70 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB107 in the middle 80%. | |
| 83 | RB | Alec IngoldLACQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB81 at the median, RB65 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB83NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB81 at the median, RB65 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | |
| 84 | RB | Phil MafahNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB67 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2% |
RB84NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB67 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | |
| 85 | RB | Devin NealNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB67 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB85↑ 3 | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB67 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | |
| 86 | RB | Craig ReynoldsWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB69 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB86NEW | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB69 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | |
| 87 | RB | Julius ChestnutTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB70 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB55 - RB103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB87NEW | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB70 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB55 - RB103 in the middle 80%. | |
| 88 | RB | Kene NwangwuNYJQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB68 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB110 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB88↓ 18 | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB68 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB110 in the middle 80%. | |
| 89 | RB | DeeJay DallasMINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB68 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB51 - RB105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB89↑ 5 | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB68 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB51 - RB105 in the middle 80%. | |
| 90 | RB | Kaytron AllenWASQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB72 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB90↓ 21 | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB72 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | |
| 91 | RB | Ameer AbdullahJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB73 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB59 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB91↓ 14 | 1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB73 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB59 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | |
| 92 | RB | Roschon JohnsonCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB72 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB58 - RB106 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB92NEW | 1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB72 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB58 - RB106 in the middle 80%. | |
| 93 | RB | Sean TuckerTBQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB95 at the median, RB77 - RB107 in the middle half, and RB51 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB93↓ 13 | 1.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB95 at the median, RB77 - RB107 in the middle half, and RB51 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 94 | RB | Hunter LuepkeDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB90 at the median, RB77 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB64 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB94NEW | 1.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB90 at the median, RB77 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB64 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | |
| 95 | RB | Bam KnightARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB95 at the median, RB80 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB63 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB95↓ 22 | 1.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB95 at the median, RB80 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB63 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | |
| 96 | RB | Demond ClaiborneMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB82 - RB105 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB96↑ 1 | 1.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB82 - RB105 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB111 in the middle 80%. | |
| 97 | RB | Tyrone Tracy Jr.NYGQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB81 - RB105 in the middle half, and RB65 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB97NEW | 1.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB81 - RB105 in the middle half, and RB65 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | |
| 98 | RB | Salvon AhmedCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB101 at the median, RB86 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB116 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB98NEW | 1.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB101 at the median, RB86 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB116 in the middle 80%. | |
| 99 | RB | Jonathan WardBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB100 at the median, RB85 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB116 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB99NEW | 1.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB100 at the median, RB85 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB116 in the middle 80%. |
Simulated finishes
This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.
Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.
Week 5 RB outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.
-
RB1 Jahmyr GibbsRB7Jahmyr Gibbs is ranked RB1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB7 at the median, RB3 - RB16 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB27 in the middle 80%.
-
RB2 Bijan RobinsonRB9Bijan Robinson is ranked RB2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB9 at the median, RB4 - RB19 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB30 in the middle 80%.
-
RB3 Jonathan TaylorRB12Jonathan Taylor is ranked RB3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
-
RB4 Derrick HenryRB12Derrick Henry is ranked RB4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB25 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
RB14Christian McCaffrey is ranked RB5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
RB6 Kyren WilliamsRB14Kyren Williams is ranked RB6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
RB7 Ashton JeantyRB15Ashton Jeanty is ranked RB7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
RB8 Chase BrownRB15Chase Brown is ranked RB8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB27 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
RB9 James CookRB15James Cook is ranked RB9 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
-
RB10 Javonte WilliamsRB15Javonte Williams is ranked RB10 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB40 in the middle 80%.
-
RB11 Aaron JonesRB17Aaron Jones is ranked RB11 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
RB12 Jaylen WarrenRB17Jaylen Warren is ranked RB12 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
RB13 Quinshon JudkinsRB18Quinshon Judkins is ranked RB13 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
-
RB14 D'Andre SwiftRB20D'Andre Swift is ranked RB14 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB9 - RB36 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
-
RB15 Bhayshul TutenRB21Bhayshul Tuten is ranked RB15 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB11 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
-
RB16 Cam SkatteboRB23Cam Skattebo is ranked RB16 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB10 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
RB17 Jeremiyah LoveRB23Jeremiyah Love is ranked RB17 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
-
RB18 Bucky IrvingRB24Bucky Irving is ranked RB18 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
-
RB19 Rhamondre StevensonRB24Rhamondre Stevenson is ranked RB19 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
-
RB20 Emanuel WilsonRB24Emanuel Wilson is ranked RB20 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
RB21 Tony PollardRB27Tony Pollard is ranked RB21 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB14 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
-
RB22 Omarion HamptonRB27Omarion Hampton is ranked RB22 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB14 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
-
RB23 Braelon AllenRB27Braelon Allen is ranked RB23 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB15 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
-
RB24 TreVeyon HendersonRB31TreVeyon Henderson is ranked RB24 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB15 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
Show RB25 - RB36
-
RB25 David MontgomeryRB29David Montgomery is ranked RB25 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB16 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
-
RB26 Ollie Gordon IIRB31Ollie Gordon II is ranked RB26 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
-
RB32Jacory Croskey-Merritt is ranked RB27 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
-
RB28 Alvin KamaraRB33Alvin Kamara is ranked RB28 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB57 in the middle 80%.
-
RB29 RJ HarveyRB32RJ Harvey is ranked RB29 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB57 in the middle 80%.
-
RB30 J.K. DobbinsRB33J.K. Dobbins is ranked RB30 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB18 - RB46 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB57 in the middle 80%.
-
RB31 Brian RobinsonRB37Brian Robinson is ranked RB31 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB19 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
-
RB32 MarShawn LloydRB37MarShawn Lloyd is ranked RB32 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB21 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
-
RB33 Rachaad WhiteRB38Rachaad White is ranked RB33 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB21 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB11 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
-
RB34 Rico DowdleRB40Rico Dowdle is ranked RB34 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB22 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
-
RB35 Blake CorumRB38Blake Corum is ranked RB35 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB22 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
-
RB36 Keaton MitchellRB39Keaton Mitchell is ranked RB36 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.
The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.
How these are made
This board was built from 2026 usage for 74% of the board, draft position for 100%, an outside projection for 58%, sportsbook props for 68%, an official status for 82%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Half PPR, 1QB.
Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured October 8, 2026 18:07 UTC. Movement is previous - current; positive means the player moved up the board (a smaller rank number), measured in positional rank against the final Week 4 board generated before that week's first kickoff (October 1, 2026). Model rankings-v1.4.2, board captured 2026-10-08.
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
