NFL · 2026 Week 8
2026 Week 8 Standard RB Rankings
Final pre-kickoff board · published October 29, 2026, 16:59 UTC · first kickoff October 30, 2026, 00:15 UTC
Standard, 1QB · 95 players projected · updated October 29, 2026
How these rankings work
How these rankings are built
We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.
We then update those expectations for Week 8 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.
We then simulate the week 4,000 times. The projected fantasy points those simulations produce set the order and the tiers.
This board is priced in Standard. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.
How the tiers work
Players are grouped into tiers at each position by projected fantasy points. A new tier starts where the projections separate, not after a set number of players, so tiers vary in size and a player who stands apart can be a tier on his own.
The breaks come from the best grouping of each position's projections, the method behind Jenks natural breaks, with gaps judged against how widely weekly scores vary at that position. The rule is the same every week and nobody places players by hand.
Within a tier, players are listed by projected points, but the gaps between them are small. They shouldn't decide a start/sit on their own.
A tier's band is the range of its players' projected points. It isn't a range of outcomes.
A player's 80% range is the middle of his simulated scores: the model puts 10% of outcomes below it and 10% above. Real scores can land outside it.
Players in neighbouring tiers often have overlapping ranges. A higher tier means more projected points, not a guarantee of outscoring everyone below it.
What the percentages mean
For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.
- Top 3
- how often he finishes among the top three at his position
- Top 12
- how often he finishes in the top 12
- Top 24
- how often he finishes in the top 24
A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.
How often a strong start lasts
Since 1999, 68% of RBs inside the top 12 through Week 7 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 324 RB-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.
What stood out in Week 8
95 RBs in 11 tiers for Week 8. Jahmyr Gibbs leads at 17.9 projected points.
Tiers break where projected points separate, and the differences inside a tier are small. Each 80% range is the middle 80% of that player's simulated scores; real scores can fall outside it.
| Pos | Player | Proj | Outcome profile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 16.2 - 17.9 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Jahmyr GibbsDETQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 26% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 21%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB10 at the median, RB3 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 26%Top 12: 58%Top 24: 79% 80% range: 5.4 - 34.0 |
17.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 26% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 21%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB10 at the median, RB3 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB35 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kenneth Walker IIIKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 21% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 22%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB4 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 21%Top 12: 56%Top 24: 78% 80% range: 5.6 - 29.3 |
16.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 21% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 22%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB4 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 2 13.7 - 15.0 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Bijan RobinsonATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 17% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 24%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB24 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 17%Top 12: 51%Top 24: 76% 80% range: 5.6 - 27.4 |
15.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 17% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 24%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB24 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | James Cook IIIBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB13 at the median, RB6 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 16%Top 12: 49%Top 24: 73% 80% range: 5.0 - 27.3 |
14.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 33%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB13 at the median, RB6 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Derrick HenryBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 15% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 15%Top 12: 46%Top 24: 70% 80% range: 4.7 - 25.8 |
13.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 15% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Javonte WilliamsDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 14%Top 12: 46%Top 24: 70% 80% range: 4.7 - 25.1 |
13.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 14% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 3 11.9 - 12.9 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Bucky IrvingTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 32%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB39 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 41%Top 24: 68% 80% range: 4.7 - 23.4 |
12.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 32%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB39 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jonathan TaylorIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 34%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB39 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 41%Top 24: 66% 80% range: 4.5 - 23.6 |
12.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 34%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB39 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | D'Andre SwiftCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 40%Top 24: 65% 80% range: 4.2 - 23.6 |
12.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB41 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kyren WilliamsLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 36%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB40 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 39%Top 24: 64% 80% range: 4.4 - 22.6 |
12.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 36%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB40 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jaylen WarrenPIT Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 34%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 39%Top 24: 66% 80% range: 4.7 - 22.7 |
12.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 34%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB38 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Chuba HubbardCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 37%Top 24: 63% 80% range: 4.2 - 22.5 |
12.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Breece HallNYJQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB9 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 35%Top 24: 56% 80% range: 3.0 - 24.2 |
11.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB9 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB49 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 4 10.2 - 11.6 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Tony PollardTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 40%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 34%Top 24: 60% 80% range: 4.2 - 21.6 |
11.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 40%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Bhayshul TutenJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 43%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 32%Top 24: 57% 80% range: 3.9 - 21.0 |
11.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 43%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ashton JeantyLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 41%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB33 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 32%Top 24: 59% 80% range: 4.1 - 20.8 |
11.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 41%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB33 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB41 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Josh JacobsGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB10 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 30%Top 24: 52% 80% range: 3.2 - 21.5 |
10.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB10 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Chase BrownCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 54% 80% range: 3.7 - 20.0 |
10.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB44 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ollie Gordon IIMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 54% 80% range: 3.4 - 20.1 |
10.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB46 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Braelon AllenNYJQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 27%Top 24: 51% 80% range: 3.1 - 20.1 |
10.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 5 9.0 - 9.7 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Aaron Jones Sr.MINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 52%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 48% 80% range: 2.9 - 19.0 |
9.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 52%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB50 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Emanuel WilsonSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 47% 80% range: 2.9 - 18.5 |
9.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB50 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jeremiyah LoveARIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 54%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB13 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 46% 80% range: 2.6 - 18.9 |
9.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 54%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB13 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB52 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Rhamondre StevensonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 47% 80% range: 3.2 - 17.5 |
9.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB47 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Saquon BarkleyPHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB13 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 44% 80% range: 2.4 - 18.5 |
9.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB13 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB55 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Quinshon JudkinsCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB28 at the median, RB14 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 44% 80% range: 3.1 - 17.7 |
9.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB28 at the median, RB14 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kyle MonangaiCHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 58%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB14 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 42% 80% range: 2.0 - 19.4 |
9.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 58%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB14 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB59 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 6 7.2 - 8.1 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Zach CharbonnetSEAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 63%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB17 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB66 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 19%Top 24: 37% 80% range: 1.6 - 17.8 |
8.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 63%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB17 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB66 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Rachaad WhiteWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB54 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 39% 80% range: 2.5 - 15.9 |
7.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB54 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Blake CorumLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 39% 80% range: 2.7 - 15.0 |
7.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB52 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jordan MasonMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 38% 80% range: 2.3 - 16.2 |
7.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB56 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Omarion HamptonLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB19 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 34% 80% range: 2.4 - 14.5 |
7.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB19 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB56 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 7 6.0 - 6.6 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Rico DowdlePIT Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB21 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 30% 80% range: 2.1 - 13.0 |
6.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB21 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB58 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | J.K. DobbinsDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB21 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 30% 80% range: 2.1 - 13.0 |
6.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB21 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB59 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jonah ColemanDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 28% 80% range: 1.9 - 12.9 |
6.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB60 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Tyler AllgeierARIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB23 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 27% 80% range: 1.9 - 13.0 |
6.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB23 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Brian Robinson Jr.ATLQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB43 at the median, RB23 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB69 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 27% 80% range: 1.4 - 13.1 |
6.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB43 at the median, RB23 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB69 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 8 4.2 - 5.4 projected points | |||||||
| RB | TreVeyon HendersonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB43 at the median, RB27 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 22% 80% range: 1.8 - 11.0 |
5.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB43 at the median, RB27 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB63 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | RJ HarveyDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB44 at the median, RB28 - RB55 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB64 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 21% 80% range: 1.7 - 10.7 |
5.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB44 at the median, RB28 - RB55 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB64 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kenny GainwellTBQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB29 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 1.5 - 10.7 |
5.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB29 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Chris Rodriguez Jr.JAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB31 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB66 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 1.6 - 10.3 |
4.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB31 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB66 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Samaje PerineCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB30 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB66 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 20% 80% range: 1.6 - 10.3 |
4.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB30 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB66 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Mike Washington Jr.LV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB31 - RB56 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB65 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 1.7 - 9.9 |
4.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB31 - RB56 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB65 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kimani VidalLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB32 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB66 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 17% 80% range: 1.6 - 10.0 |
4.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB32 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB66 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | MarShawn LloydGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB32 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 1.4 - 9.8 |
4.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB32 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Roschon JohnsonCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB33 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 18% 80% range: 1.2 - 9.9 |
4.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB33 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB73 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Keaton MitchellLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB35 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 16% 80% range: 1.5 - 9.7 |
4.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB35 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB67 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jeremy McNicholsWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB34 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 16% 80% range: 1.2 - 9.8 |
4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB34 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB73 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Tyjae SpearsTENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB33 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB72 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 16% 80% range: 1.3 - 9.7 |
4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB33 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB72 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Tyler GoodsonDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB36 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB72 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 1.3 - 9.4 |
4.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB36 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB72 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 9 3.0 - 3.9 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Bam KnightARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB52 at the median, RB39 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB72 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 12% 80% range: 1.2 - 8.8 |
3.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB52 at the median, RB39 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB72 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | George HolaniSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB39 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 13% 80% range: 1.2 - 8.9 |
3.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB39 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB73 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Dylan SampsonCLEQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB40 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB78 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 12% 80% range: 1.0 - 8.7 |
3.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB40 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB78 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Pierre Strong Jr.GB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB41 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB76 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 12% 80% range: 1.0 - 8.5 |
3.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB41 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB76 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Evan HullARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB42 - RB72 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 12% 80% range: 0.8 - 8.7 |
3.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB42 - RB72 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB81 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Justice HillBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB42 - RB64 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB72 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% 80% range: 1.3 - 8.4 |
3.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB42 - RB64 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB72 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Seth McGowanIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB43 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB74 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% 80% range: 1.1 - 8.4 |
3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB43 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB74 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ty JohnsonBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB42 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB75 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 10% 80% range: 1.1 - 8.3 |
3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB42 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB75 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jaylen WrightMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB45 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB77 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 10% 80% range: 1.0 - 8.2 |
3.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB45 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB77 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Sean TuckerTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB45 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10% 80% range: 0.9 - 8.2 |
3.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB45 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Craig ReynoldsWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB62 at the median, RB45 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 11% 80% range: 0.8 - 8.2 |
3.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB62 at the median, RB45 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB83 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Emmett JohnsonKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB45 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB75 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 9% 80% range: 1.1 - 7.9 |
3.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB45 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB75 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Anthony Tyus IIICAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB46 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.9 |
3.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB46 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jaleel McLaughlinCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB46 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB78 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.9 |
3.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB46 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB78 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Corey KinerNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB48 - RB69 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB77 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 8% 80% range: 1.0 - 7.8 |
3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB48 - RB69 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB77 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 10 1.8 - 2.8 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Trevor EtienneCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB63 at the median, RB48 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 8% 80% range: 0.8 - 7.5 |
2.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB63 at the median, RB48 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB83 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kaleb JohnsonGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB53 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% 80% range: 0.8 - 7.2 |
2.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB53 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB81 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | DJ GiddensIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB52 - RB78 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB88 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 7% 80% range: 0.6 - 7.1 |
2.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB52 - RB78 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB88 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Khalil HerbertATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB69 at the median, RB55 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB89 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% 80% range: 0.6 - 6.9 |
2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB69 at the median, RB55 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB89 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Isaiah DavisNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB68 at the median, RB56 - RB77 in the middle half, and RB33 - RB85 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% 80% range: 0.7 - 6.4 |
2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB68 at the median, RB56 - RB77 in the middle half, and RB33 - RB85 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ray DavisBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB60 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB87 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% 80% range: 0.6 - 5.7 |
2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB60 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB87 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Sione VakiDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB61 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB87 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 4% 80% range: 0.6 - 4.1 |
2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB61 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB87 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | AJ DillonCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB63 - RB83 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB90 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.6 - 3.3 |
1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB63 - RB83 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB90 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Israel AbanikandaDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB63 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB97 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.4 - 3.8 |
1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB63 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB97 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 11 0.8 - 1.6 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Nate CarterKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB79 at the median, RB66 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.4 - 3.2 |
1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB79 at the median, RB66 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB47 - RB98 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Austin EkelerWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB67 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB94 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.5 - 2.7 |
1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB67 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB94 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Owen WrightLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB66 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.4 - 3.3 |
1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB66 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB98 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Max BredesonMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB66 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB97 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.4 - 2.9 |
1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB66 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB97 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Elijah MitchellPHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB81 at the median, RB70 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB55 - RB101 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.3 - 2.3 |
1.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB81 at the median, RB70 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB55 - RB101 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jerome FordARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB73 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB57 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.3 - 2.2 |
1.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB73 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB57 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Salvon AhmedCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB73 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB55 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.3 - 2.3 |
1.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB73 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB55 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kaytron AllenMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB74 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB100 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.4 - 1.9 |
1.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB74 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB100 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Hunter LuepkeDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB72 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.4 - 2.0 |
1.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB72 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB95 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kalel MullingsTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB75 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.3 - 1.9 |
1.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB75 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB105 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Demond ClaiborneMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB75 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB102 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.3 - 1.8 |
1.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB75 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB102 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Carlos Washington Jr.MIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB73 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB58 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.3 - 2.1 |
1.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB73 - RB96 in the middle half, and RB58 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Velus Jones Jr.SEAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB77 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB63 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.7 |
1.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB77 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB63 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Audric EstiméCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB81 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB68 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.4 |
1.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB81 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB68 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Devin NealWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB81 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB68 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.5 |
1.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB81 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB68 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | DJ HermanMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB78 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.3 - 1.6 |
1.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB78 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB107 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kendall MiltonCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB80 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB67 - RB110 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.5 |
0.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB80 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB67 - RB110 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Dean ConnorsLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB82 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB72 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.3 |
0.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB82 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB72 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Dylan LaubeLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB89 at the median, RB81 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB74 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.3 - 1.2 |
0.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB89 at the median, RB81 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB74 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Brady RussellSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB93 at the median, RB84 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB75 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 0% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.1 |
0.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB93 at the median, RB84 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB75 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Nicholas SingletonTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB84 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB74 - RB110 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.2 - 1.2 |
0.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB84 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB74 - RB110 in the middle 80%. | ||||
Simulated finishes
This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.
Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.
Week 8 RB outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.
-
Tier 1 Jahmyr GibbsRB10Jahmyr Gibbs is in Tier 1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB10 at the median, RB3 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 1 Kenneth Walker IIIRB11Kenneth Walker III is in Tier 1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB4 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Bijan RobinsonRB12Bijan Robinson is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB24 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 James Cook IIIRB13James Cook III is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB13 at the median, RB6 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Derrick HenryRB14Derrick Henry is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Javonte WilliamsRB14Javonte Williams is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB6 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Bucky IrvingRB16Bucky Irving is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB39 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Jonathan TaylorRB16Jonathan Taylor is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB39 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 D'Andre SwiftRB16D'Andre Swift is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB7 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Kyren WilliamsRB17Kyren Williams is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB40 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Jaylen WarrenRB17Jaylen Warren is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Chuba HubbardRB18Chuba Hubbard is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Breece HallRB21Breece Hall is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB9 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Tony PollardRB19Tony Pollard is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Bhayshul TutenRB20Bhayshul Tuten is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Ashton JeantyRB20Ashton Jeanty is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB33 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB41 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Josh JacobsRB23Josh Jacobs is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB10 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Chase BrownRB22Chase Brown is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Ollie Gordon IIRB22Ollie Gordon II is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Braelon AllenRB24Braelon Allen is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Aaron Jones Sr.RB26Aaron Jones Sr. is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Emanuel WilsonRB26Emanuel Wilson is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Jeremiyah LoveRB27Jeremiyah Love is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB27 at the median, RB13 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Rhamondre StevensonRB26Rhamondre Stevenson is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Show RB25 - RB36
-
Tier 5 Saquon BarkleyRB29Saquon Barkley is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB13 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Quinshon JudkinsRB28Quinshon Judkins is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB28 at the median, RB14 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Kyle MonangaiRB30Kyle Monangai is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB14 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Zach CharbonnetRB35Zach Charbonnet is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB17 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB66 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Rachaad WhiteRB32Rachaad White is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB54 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Blake CorumRB32Blake Corum is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Jordan MasonRB32Jordan Mason is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Omarion HamptonRB35Omarion Hampton is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB19 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Rico DowdleRB37Rico Dowdle is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB21 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 J.K. DobbinsRB39J.K. Dobbins is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB21 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Jonah ColemanRB39Jonah Coleman is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Tyler AllgeierRB40Tyler Allgeier is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB23 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.
The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.
How these are made
This board was built from 2026 usage for 77% of the board, draft position for 99%, an outside projection for 55%, sportsbook props for 65%, an official status for 81%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Standard, 1QB.
Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured October 29, 2026 16:58 UTC. Model rankings-v1.5.1, board captured 2026-10-29.
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
