Let’s Mock Draft Run a mock draft

NFL · 2026 Week 2

2026 Week 2 Half PPR WR Rankings

Final pre-kickoff board · published September 17, 2026, 19:05 UTC · first kickoff September 18, 2026, 00:15 UTC

Half PPR, 1QB · 135 players projected · updated September 17, 2026

See how these rankings performed

View current weekly rankings

No earlier market snapshot, so no market movement is shown.

How these rankings work

How these rankings are built

We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.

We then update those expectations for Week 2 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.

We then simulate the week 4,000 times and rank players by the projected fantasy points those simulations produce.

This board is priced in Half PPR. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.

What the percentages mean

For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.

Top 3
how often he finishes among the top three at his position
Top 12
how often he finishes in the top 12
Top 24
how often he finishes in the top 24

A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.

How often a strong start lasts

Since 1999, 32% of WRs inside the top 12 through Week 1 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 324 WR-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.

What stood out in Week 2

135 WRs ranked for Week 2. Jaxon Smith-Njigba leads at 15.5 projected points.

Tier break

2.1 projected points separate WR8 CeeDee Lamb from WR9 Drake London.

Biggest differences from the draft market

Ahead

  • Devaughn VeleWR33Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 1% · Top 12: 10% · Top 24: 23% +31 vs. WR64
  • Jalen CokerWR22Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 18% · Top 24: 32% +28 vs. WR50
  • Christian WatsonWR21Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 18% · Top 24: 35% +11 vs. WR32

Behind

  • Terry McLaurinWR37Our projection is lower than the outside forecastTop 3: 2% · Top 12: 10% · Top 24: 22% -13 vs. WR24
  • Rome OdunzeWR39Our projection is lower than the outside forecastTop 3: 1% · Top 12: 9% · Top 24: 21% -12 vs. WR27
  • Michael PittmanWR44Our projection is lower than the outside forecast -10 vs. WR34

Movement

Risers

  • Jalen CokerWR22Top 3: 4% · Top 12: 18% · Top 24: 32% ↑ 24
  • Christian WatsonWR21Top 3: 4% · Top 12: 18% · Top 24: 35% ↑ 19
  • Devaughn VeleWR33Top 3: 1% · Top 12: 10% · Top 24: 23% ↑ 17

Fallers

Positional movement since the final Week 1 board, among players inside WR36 either week. Players not ranked at their position then are excluded.

2026 Week 2 Half PPR WR Rankings -- Half PPR scoring: projected fantasy points and the share of simulated weeks finishing top 3, top 12 and top 24 at the position. From our own statistical and market model, not analyst consensus.
# Pos Player Pos rank Proj
1 WR Jaxon Smith-NjigbaSEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 25% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 26%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR10 at the median, WR4 - WR26 in the middle half, and WR1 - WR45 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 25%Top 12: 56%Top 24: 74%
 WR1↑ 2 15.5
2 WR Amon-Ra St. BrownDET
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 24% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR10 at the median, WR4 - WR26 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR44 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 24%Top 12: 56%Top 24: 74%
 WR2↑ 2 15.1
3 WR Puka NacuaLAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 23% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR11 at the median, WR4 - WR29 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 23%Top 12: 53%Top 24: 70%
 WR3↓ 2 14.9
4 WR Ja'Marr ChaseCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR12 at the median, WR5 - WR30 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 19%Top 12: 51%Top 24: 69%
 WR4↓ 2 13.8
5 WR Justin JeffersonMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR12 at the median, WR5 - WR31 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 19%Top 12: 50%Top 24: 69%
 WR5↑ 1 13.8
6 WR Chris OlaveNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 15% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR15 at the median, WR6 - WR34 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 15%Top 12: 44%Top 24: 65%
 WR6↑ 6 12.7
7 WR Nico CollinsHOUQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 41%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR17 at the median, WR6 - WR41 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 16%Top 12: 42%Top 24: 59%
 WR7— 12.4
8 WR CeeDee LambDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 15% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 41%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR17 at the median, WR6 - WR39 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 15%Top 12: 41%Top 24: 59%
 WR8↓ 3 12.3
9 WR Drake LondonATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR24 at the median, WR9 - WR44 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 33%Top 24: 50%
 WR9↓ 1 10.2
10 WR Garrett WilsonNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 52%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR26 at the median, WR11 - WR44 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR61 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 48%
 WR10↑ 6 9.7
11 WR Malik NabersNYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 54%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR28 at the median, WR11 - WR48 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 46%
 WR11↑ 3 9.7
12 WR George PickensDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 54%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR28 at the median, WR11 - WR50 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 46%
 WR12↓ 2 9.6
13 WR Zay FlowersBALQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 58%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR12 - WR55 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 26%Top 24: 42%
 WR13↑ 5 9.2
14 WR Tetairoa McMillanCAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 57%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR31 at the median, WR13 - WR49 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR65 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 25%Top 24: 43%
 WR14↓ 1 9.0
15 WR DeVonta SmithPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 56%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR30 at the median, WR13 - WR48 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR66 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 44%
 WR15↓ 4 8.9
16 WR DJ MooreBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR13 - WR49 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 41%
 WR16↑ 8 8.8
17 WR Rashee RiceKC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 61%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR36 at the median, WR14 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 39%
 WR17↓ 2 8.4
18 WR Ladd McConkeyLACQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR40 at the median, WR15 - WR65 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 21%Top 24: 36%
 WR18↑ 3 8.0
19 WR Emeka EgbukaTB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR39 at the median, WR16 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 19%Top 24: 34%
 WR19↓ 2 7.7
20 WR Tee HigginsCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR39 at the median, WR16 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR77 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 19%Top 24: 34%
 WR20— 7.7
21 WR Christian WatsonGB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR39 at the median, WR17 - WR58 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 18%Top 24: 35%
 WR21↑ 19 7.6
22 WR Jalen CokerCARQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR18 - WR64 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR93 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 18%Top 24: 32%
 WR22↑ 24 7.4
23 WR Jameson WilliamsDET
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR41 at the median, WR18 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 32%
 WR23↑ 3 7.3
24 WR Luther Burden IIICHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR20 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 15%Top 24: 30%
 WR24↓ 2 7.1
25 WR Davante AdamsLAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR19 - WR66 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR90 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 30%
 WR25↓ 6 7.0
26 WR Parker WashingtonJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR21 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR82 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 15%Top 24: 29%
 WR26↑ 11 6.9
27 WR Mike EvansSF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 71%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR46 at the median, WR19 - WR69 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR94 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 29%
 WR27↑ 1 6.9
28 WR Jaylen WaddleDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR22 - WR62 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 27%
 WR28↑ 1 6.7
29 WR Matthew GoldenGB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR45 at the median, WR22 - WR68 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 27%
 WR29↑ 4 6.7
30 WR DK MetcalfPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR48 at the median, WR23 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR100 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 27%
 WR30↓ 5 6.4
31 WR Carnell TateTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR27 - WR66 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR91 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 23%
 WR31↓ 1 6.1
32 WR Courtland SuttonDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR28 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 23%
 WR32↑ 13 6.0
33 WR Devaughn VeleNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR27 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 23%
 WR33↑ 17 5.9
34 WR Stefon DiggsWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR28 - WR75 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 23%
 WR34↑ 10 5.8
35 WR Wan'Dale RobinsonTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR32 - WR72 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 19%
 WR35— 5.7
36 WR Khalil ShakirBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR31 - WR72 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 21%
 WR36↑ 15 5.7
37 WR Terry McLaurinWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR53 at the median, WR29 - WR78 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 22%
 WR37↓ 10 5.7
38 WR Deebo Samuel Sr.SF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR55 at the median, WR29 - WR82 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 21%
 WR38↑ 18 5.5
39 WR Rome OdunzeCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR57 at the median, WR30 - WR85 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 21%
 WR39↓ 16 5.4
40 WR Michael WilsonARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR57 at the median, WR34 - WR83 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 19%
 WR40↓ 6 5.3
41 WR Alec PierceINDQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR61 at the median, WR34 - WR93 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR130 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 19%
 WR41↓ 10 5.2
42 WR Caleb DouglasMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR61 at the median, WR38 - WR89 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR121 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 16%
 WR42↑ 28 4.8
43 WR Kalif RaymondCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR62 at the median, WR39 - WR92 in the middle half, and WR16 - WR123 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR43↑ 52 4.8
44 WR Michael PittmanPITQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR65 at the median, WR39 - WR99 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR44↓ 2 4.7
45 WR Xavier WorthyKC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR65 at the median, WR40 - WR93 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR125 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR45↑ 13 4.7
46 WR Jayden ReedGB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 84%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR64 at the median, WR40 - WR94 in the middle half, and WR17 - WR125 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 16%
 WR46↓ 8 4.7
47 WR Kendrick BourneARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR64 at the median, WR41 - WR95 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR127 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 13%
 WR47↑ 40 4.5
48 WR Quentin JohnstonLAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR68 at the median, WR42 - WR100 in the middle half, and WR18 - WR133 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 15%
 WR48↓ 9 4.5
49 WR Malik WashingtonMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR66 at the median, WR42 - WR96 in the middle half, and WR19 - WR126 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 14%
 WR49↑ 14 4.4
50 WR KC ConcepcionCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR66 at the median, WR42 - WR96 in the middle half, and WR19 - WR125 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 14%
 WR50↑ 3 4.4
51 WR Jordan AddisonMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR65 at the median, WR42 - WR89 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR116 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 13%
 WR51↓ 15 4.4
52 WR Marvin Harrison Jr.ARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR67 at the median, WR43 - WR97 in the middle half, and WR18 - WR131 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 14%
 WR52↓ 20 4.4
53 WR Xavier HutchinsonHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR67 at the median, WR45 - WR93 in the middle half, and WR21 - WR123 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 13%
 WR53↑ 21 4.3
54 WR Chris Godwin Jr.TB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR69 at the median, WR43 - WR99 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR131 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 14%
 WR54↓ 7 4.3
55 WR Keenan AllenIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR70 at the median, WR45 - WR100 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR132 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 12%
 WR55↑ 21 4.2
56 WR DeMario DouglasNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR71 at the median, WR45 - WR102 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR137 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 13%
 WR56↑ 27 4.2
57 WR Brian Thomas Jr.JAXQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR75 at the median, WR45 - WR113 in the middle half, and WR20 - WR151 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 13%
 WR57↓ 16 4.1
58 WR Josh DownsIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR73 at the median, WR46 - WR105 in the middle half, and WR22 - WR140 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR58↓ 4 4.0
59 WR Pat BryantDEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR74 at the median, WR48 - WR107 in the middle half, and WR22 - WR140 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 12%
 WR59↑ 34 4.0
60 WR Dontayvion WicksPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR75 at the median, WR48 - WR108 in the middle half, and WR21 - WR143 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 12%
 WR60— 4.0
61 WR Mack HollinsNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR76 at the median, WR49 - WR109 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR142 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR61↑ 42 3.9
62 WR Denzel BostonCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR75 at the median, WR49 - WR106 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR138 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 11%
 WR62↑ 2 3.9
63 WR Jakobi MeyersJAXQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR81 at the median, WR49 - WR120 in the middle half, and WR22 - WR160 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 12%
 WR63↓ 20 3.9
64 WR Roman WilsonPIT
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR79 at the median, WR50 - WR112 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR145 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR64NEW 3.8
65 WR Makai LemonPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR78 at the median, WR51 - WR113 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR147 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 11%
 WR65↓ 8 3.7
66 WR Jalen NailorLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR80 at the median, WR51 - WR113 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR146 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR66— 3.7
67 WR Adonai MitchellNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR82 at the median, WR52 - WR115 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR149 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 11%
 WR67↓ 8 3.7
68 WR Romeo DoubsNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR81 at the median, WR51 - WR114 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR148 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 11%
 WR68↓ 13 3.7
69 WR Tre HarrisLAC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR81 at the median, WR52 - WR116 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR148 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 11%
 WR69↑ 3 3.7
70 WR Tre TuckerLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR80 at the median, WR51 - WR112 in the middle half, and WR24 - WR145 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10%
 WR70↓ 21 3.7
71 WR Jerry JeudyCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR80 at the median, WR52 - WR114 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR148 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR71↓ 3 3.6
72 WR Demarcus RobinsonSF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR89 at the median, WR56 - WR127 in the middle half, and WR25 - WR161 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10%
 WR72NEW 3.4
73 WR Antonio WilliamsWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR87 at the median, WR56 - WR123 in the middle half, and WR25 - WR158 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10%
 WR73↑ 18 3.4
74 WR Jalen McMillanTBQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR101 at the median, WR56 - WR155 in the middle half, and WR23 - WR195 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 10%
 WR74↓ 12 3.4
75 WR Rashid ShaheedSEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR88 at the median, WR57 - WR123 in the middle half, and WR26 - WR157 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 9%
 WR75↓ 23 3.4
76 WR Ryan FlournoyDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR90 at the median, WR59 - WR127 in the middle half, and WR27 - WR162 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9%
 WR76↑ 12 3.3
77 WR Malachi FieldsNYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR91 at the median, WR59 - WR125 in the middle half, and WR28 - WR156 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 8%
 WR77↑ 3 3.2
78 WR Jack BechLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR94 at the median, WR62 - WR130 in the middle half, and WR31 - WR164 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 7%
 WR78↑ 4 3.1
79 WR Cooper KuppSEAQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR96 at the median, WR60 - WR139 in the middle half, and WR28 - WR178 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 8%
 WR79↓ 14 3.1
80 WR Kayshon BoutteHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR99 at the median, WR66 - WR137 in the middle half, and WR32 - WR168 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 7%
 WR80↓ 13 3.0
81 WR Bryce LanceNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR96 at the median, WR64 - WR131 in the middle half, and WR34 - WR163 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 7%
 WR81↑ 19 3.0
82 WR Calvin RidleyTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR100 at the median, WR64 - WR144 in the middle half, and WR33 - WR181 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 7%
 WR82↓ 21 3.0
83 WR Ted Hurst IIITB
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR99 at the median, WR67 - WR138 in the middle half, and WR34 - WR169 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 6%
 WR83↑ 18 2.9
84 WR Jahan DotsonATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR103 at the median, WR69 - WR140 in the middle half, and WR35 - WR170 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6%
 WR84↓ 3 2.8
85 WR Andrei IosivasCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR108 at the median, WR73 - WR145 in the middle half, and WR35 - WR179 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6%
 WR85↑ 11 2.7
86 WR Chris BellMIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR100 at the median, WR69 - WR137 in the middle half, and WR39 - WR166 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR86↑ 3 2.7
87 WR Rashod BatemanBAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR111 at the median, WR77 - WR151 in the middle half, and WR37 - WR181 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR87↓ 18 2.6
88 WR Darnell MooneyNYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR108 at the median, WR73 - WR145 in the middle half, and WR38 - WR177 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR88↑ 10 2.6
89 WR Jaylin NoelHOU
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR109 at the median, WR73 - WR146 in the middle half, and WR39 - WR177 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR89↓ 16 2.6
90 WR Xavier LegetteCAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR113 at the median, WR76 - WR152 in the middle half, and WR39 - WR182 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR90↓ 12 2.5
91 WR Jauan JenningsMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR114 at the median, WR77 - WR152 in the middle half, and WR41 - WR184 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR91↓ 20 2.5
92 WR Josh PalmerBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR112 at the median, WR79 - WR145 in the middle half, and WR46 - WR176 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR92NEW 2.5
93 WR Chris MooreBAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR111 at the median, WR75 - WR148 in the middle half, and WR38 - WR181 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR93NEW 2.5
94 WR Isaac TeSlaaDET
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR112 at the median, WR79 - WR148 in the middle half, and WR44 - WR175 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR94↓ 10 2.4
95 WR Keon ColemanBUF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR117 at the median, WR82 - WR152 in the middle half, and WR42 - WR182 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5%
 WR95↓ 1 2.4
96 WR Dyami BrownWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR120 at the median, WR83 - WR158 in the middle half, and WR42 - WR189 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR96↑ 14 2.3
97 WR Kevin Coleman Jr.MIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR117 at the median, WR80 - WR154 in the middle half, and WR52 - WR185 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR97— 2.3
98 WR Elic AyomanorTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR120 at the median, WR83 - WR161 in the middle half, and WR46 - WR190 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR98NEW 2.3
99 WR Devontez WalkerBALQQuestionable
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR142 at the median, WR89 - WR190 in the middle half, and WR44 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 5%
 WR99↑ 9 2.2
100 WR Travis HunterJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR134 at the median, WR88 - WR177 in the middle half, and WR48 - WR207 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4%
 WR100↓ 25 2.1
101 WR Isaiah WilliamsNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR128 at the median, WR90 - WR164 in the middle half, and WR57 - WR190 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR101NEW 2.1
102 WR Tyquan ThorntonKC
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR126 at the median, WR89 - WR165 in the middle half, and WR53 - WR193 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR102↓ 10 2.1
103 WR Malik BensonLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR132 at the median, WR95 - WR170 in the middle half, and WR59 - WR197 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3%
 WR103↓ 4 2.0
104 WR LaJohntay WesterBAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR134 at the median, WR97 - WR172 in the middle half, and WR62 - WR197 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR104NEW 2.0
105 WR Olamide ZaccheausATL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR141 at the median, WR99 - WR179 in the middle half, and WR62 - WR202 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3%
 WR105NEW 1.9
106 WR KaVontae TurpinDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR140 at the median, WR100 - WR176 in the middle half, and WR60 - WR202 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR106↓ 1 1.9
107 WR Kyle WilliamsNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR140 at the median, WR100 - WR177 in the middle half, and WR64 - WR202 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR107↓ 1 1.9
108 WR Marquise BrownPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR151 at the median, WR102 - WR191 in the middle half, and WR57 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR108NEW 1.9
109 WR Emmanuel Henderson Jr.SEA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR150 at the median, WR100 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR55 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR109↑ 3 1.9
110 WR K.J. OsbornTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR104 - WR191 in the middle half, and WR55 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR110NEW 1.9
111 WR Odell Beckham Jr.NYG
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR140 at the median, WR93 - WR182 in the middle half, and WR55 - WR210 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR111NEW 1.9
112 WR Zavion ThomasCHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR148 at the median, WR99 - WR188 in the middle half, and WR56 - WR212 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR112NEW 1.9
113 WR Jalen BrooksARI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR155 at the median, WR106 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR113NEW 1.8
114 WR Ke'Shawn WilliamsCIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR150 at the median, WR103 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR58 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR114NEW 1.8
115 WR Ronnie BellLV
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR104 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR115NEW 1.8
116 WR Bryce OliverTEN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR105 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR62 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR116NEW 1.8
117 WR Chandler BrayboyNE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR150 at the median, WR103 - WR190 in the middle half, and WR58 - WR213 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR117NEW 1.8
118 WR Brennan PresleyLAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR151 at the median, WR102 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR60 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR118NEW 1.8
119 WR Deion BurksIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR151 at the median, WR104 - WR190 in the middle half, and WR58 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR119NEW 1.8
120 WR Josh CameronJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR144 at the median, WR104 - WR181 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR205 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR120NEW 1.8
121 WR Elijah SarrattBAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR153 at the median, WR103 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR58 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR121NEW 1.8
122 WR Camden BrownDAL
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR103 - WR191 in the middle half, and WR60 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR122NEW 1.8
123 WR Treylon BurksWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR105 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR62 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR123↓ 16 1.8
124 WR Tyler JohnsonNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR153 at the median, WR106 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3%
 WR124NEW 1.8
125 WR Danny GrayPHI
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR151 at the median, WR104 - WR191 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR125NEW 1.8
126 WR Cedrick Wilson Jr.MIA
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR150 at the median, WR101 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR58 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR126NEW 1.8
127 WR Cedric TillmanNO
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR153 at the median, WR105 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR55 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR127NEW 1.8
128 WR Tim JonesJAX
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR153 at the median, WR104 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2%
 WR128NEW 1.8
129 WR Jordan WatkinsSF
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR107 - WR193 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR215 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR129NEW 1.8
130 WR Bub MeansCLE
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR104 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3%
 WR130NEW 1.8
131 WR Coleman OwenIND
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR103 - WR191 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR213 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3%
 WR131NEW 1.8
132 WR Tai FeltonMIN
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR150 at the median, WR105 - WR191 in the middle half, and WR59 - WR213 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR132NEW 1.8
133 WR Van JeffersonWAS
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR150 at the median, WR102 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR57 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR133NEW 1.8
134 WR Alex BachmanLAR
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR152 at the median, WR104 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR63 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2%
 WR134NEW 1.8
135 WR Sterling ShepardNYJ
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR153 at the median, WR103 - WR192 in the middle half, and WR61 - WR214 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3%
 WR135NEW 1.8

Simulated finishes

This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.

Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.

Week 2 WR outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.

Projected rank
Median finish
1361224366090
  1. WR1 Jaxon Smith-Njigba
    WR10
    Jaxon Smith-Njigba is ranked WR1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR10 at the median, WR4 - WR26 in the middle half, and WR1 - WR45 in the middle 80%.
  2. WR2 Amon-Ra St. Brown
    WR10
    Amon-Ra St. Brown is ranked WR2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR10 at the median, WR4 - WR26 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR44 in the middle 80%.
  3. WR3 Puka Nacua
    WR11
    Puka Nacua is ranked WR3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR11 at the median, WR4 - WR29 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR47 in the middle 80%.
  4. WR4 Ja'Marr Chase
    WR12
    Ja'Marr Chase is ranked WR4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR12 at the median, WR5 - WR30 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR46 in the middle 80%.
  5. WR5 Justin Jefferson
    WR12
    Justin Jefferson is ranked WR5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR12 at the median, WR5 - WR31 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR46 in the middle 80%.
  6. WR6 Chris Olave
    WR15
    Chris Olave is ranked WR6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR15 at the median, WR6 - WR34 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR48 in the middle 80%.
  7. WR7 Nico Collins
    WR17
    Nico Collins is ranked WR7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR17 at the median, WR6 - WR41 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR60 in the middle 80%.
  8. WR8 CeeDee Lamb
    WR17
    CeeDee Lamb is ranked WR8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR17 at the median, WR6 - WR39 in the middle half, and WR2 - WR56 in the middle 80%.
  9. WR9 Drake London
    WR24
    Drake London is ranked WR9 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR24 at the median, WR9 - WR44 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR60 in the middle 80%.
  10. WR10 Garrett Wilson
    WR26
    Garrett Wilson is ranked WR10 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR26 at the median, WR11 - WR44 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR61 in the middle 80%.
  11. WR11 Malik Nabers
    WR28
    Malik Nabers is ranked WR11 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR28 at the median, WR11 - WR48 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR67 in the middle 80%.
  12. WR12 George Pickens
    WR28
    George Pickens is ranked WR12 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR28 at the median, WR11 - WR50 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR68 in the middle 80%.
  13. WR13 Zay Flowers
    WR32
    Zay Flowers is ranked WR13 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR12 - WR55 in the middle half, and WR4 - WR83 in the middle 80%.
  14. WR14 Tetairoa McMillan
    WR31
    Tetairoa McMillan is ranked WR14 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR31 at the median, WR13 - WR49 in the middle half, and WR5 - WR65 in the middle 80%.
  15. WR15 DeVonta Smith
    WR30
    DeVonta Smith is ranked WR15 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR30 at the median, WR13 - WR48 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR66 in the middle 80%.
  16. WR16 DJ Moore
    WR32
    DJ Moore is ranked WR16 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR32 at the median, WR13 - WR49 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR67 in the middle 80%.
  17. WR17 Rashee Rice
    WR36
    Rashee Rice is ranked WR17 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR36 at the median, WR14 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR80 in the middle 80%.
  18. WR18 Ladd McConkey
    WR40
    Ladd McConkey is ranked WR18 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR40 at the median, WR15 - WR65 in the middle half, and WR6 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  19. WR19 Emeka Egbuka
    WR39
    Emeka Egbuka is ranked WR19 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR39 at the median, WR16 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR83 in the middle 80%.
  20. WR20 Tee Higgins
    WR39
    Tee Higgins is ranked WR20 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR39 at the median, WR16 - WR56 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR77 in the middle 80%.
  21. WR21 Christian Watson
    WR39
    Christian Watson is ranked WR21 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR39 at the median, WR17 - WR58 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR80 in the middle 80%.
  22. WR22 Jalen Coker
    WR42
    Jalen Coker is ranked WR22 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR18 - WR64 in the middle half, and WR7 - WR93 in the middle 80%.
  23. WR23 Jameson Williams
    WR41
    Jameson Williams is ranked WR23 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR41 at the median, WR18 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR81 in the middle 80%.
  24. WR24 Luther Burden III
    WR42
    Luther Burden III is ranked WR24 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR20 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR80 in the middle 80%.
Show WR25 - WR36
  1. WR25 Davante Adams
    WR44
    Davante Adams is ranked WR25 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR19 - WR66 in the middle half, and WR8 - WR90 in the middle 80%.
  2. WR26 Parker Washington
    WR42
    Parker Washington is ranked WR26 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR42 at the median, WR21 - WR60 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR82 in the middle 80%.
  3. WR27 Mike Evans
    WR46
    Mike Evans is ranked WR27 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR46 at the median, WR19 - WR69 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR94 in the middle 80%.
  4. WR28 Jaylen Waddle
    WR44
    Jaylen Waddle is ranked WR28 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR44 at the median, WR22 - WR62 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR84 in the middle 80%.
  5. WR29 Matthew Golden
    WR45
    Matthew Golden is ranked WR29 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR45 at the median, WR22 - WR68 in the middle half, and WR9 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  6. WR30 DK Metcalf
    WR48
    DK Metcalf is ranked WR30 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR48 at the median, WR23 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR10 - WR100 in the middle 80%.
  7. WR31 Carnell Tate
    WR47
    Carnell Tate is ranked WR31 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR47 at the median, WR27 - WR66 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR91 in the middle 80%.
  8. WR32 Courtland Sutton
    WR50
    Courtland Sutton is ranked WR32 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR50 at the median, WR28 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  9. WR33 Devaughn Vele
    WR49
    Devaughn Vele is ranked WR33 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR49 at the median, WR27 - WR71 in the middle half, and WR13 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  10. WR34 Stefon Diggs
    WR51
    Stefon Diggs is ranked WR34 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR28 - WR75 in the middle half, and WR12 - WR104 in the middle 80%.
  11. WR35 Wan'Dale Robinson
    WR51
    Wan'Dale Robinson is ranked WR35 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR32 - WR72 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR95 in the middle 80%.
  12. WR36 Khalil Shakir
    WR51
    Khalil Shakir is ranked WR36 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes WR51 at the median, WR31 - WR72 in the middle half, and WR14 - WR96 in the middle 80%.

Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.

The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.

How these are made

This board was built from 2026 usage for 58% of the board, draft position for 100%, an outside projection for 58%, sportsbook props for 6%, an official status for 82%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Half PPR, 1QB.

Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured September 17, 2026 19:04 UTC. Movement is previous - current; positive means the player moved up the board (a smaller rank number), measured in positional rank against the final Week 1 board generated before that week's first kickoff (September 9, 2026). Model rankings-v1.3.0, board captured 2026-09-17.

LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.

LMD Rankings, rankings-v1.3.0. Inputs: Ball Don't Lie (fantasy market, player status, projections); Polymarket (prediction-market prices); The Odds API (player props).

Browse every player page