LAR · Bye 11
Davante Adams
LMD WR6 for Week 3 · 12.4 projected Half PPR points · WR5 rest of season
Regular season
Week 3 and rest of season fantasy rankings
We project 12.4 points this week, WR6. Top 3: 9% · Top 12: 28% · Top 24: 46% of simulated weeks. Up 19 since Week 2.
Week 3
WR6
21st by projected points
Rest of season
WR5
18th by projected points
Projected
12.4
week 3, Half PPR
Top 12
28%
Top 3: 9% · Top 24: 46% at WR
Movement
↑ 19
WR25 in Week 2, WR6 now
- Draft / market prior
- Negative-0.97 pts
- Recent usage & efficiency
- Positive+1.72 pts
- AvailabilityAvailable
- Neutral0.00 pts
- Outside projection
- Slight negative-0.19 pts
- Betting markets
- No signal
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?
How to read
- Full model minus the model without each factor.
- Effects are not additive or changes in rank.
- Recent data includes its effect on blending weights.
- A range note means a factor moved the spread and not the expected points.
Half PPR scoring · Updated September 22, 2026
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
Updates
Recent updates
-
Davante Adams, Matthew Stafford lead Rams past Giants 28-6 after Jaxson Dart's injury
ksl.com ·
-
Rams' usage of Davante Adams was puzzling in Week 1
Yahoo Sports ·
-
ADP UPDATE
Davante Adams's ADP at Fantasy Football Calculator moved from 37.6 to 33.9 over the last 7 days.
-
Rams fans react to 49ers loss: ‘Is Davante Adams washed?’
Yahoo Sports ·
-
Davante Adams Fantasy Prediction 2026: Half His Points Came in the End Zone
Yahoo Sports ·
Headlines from other publishers, discovered automatically and matched to Davante Adams by name -- we did not write these and we do not host them, and each one opens at the publisher who did. Draft-position figures are measured, and name the market they came from.
Season performance
Performance vs. projection
Over 2 completed games Davante Adams has averaged +11.9 points a game against what we projected before kickoff.
| Week | Opp | Proj | Actual | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | vs SF | 8.8 | 4.1 | -4.7 |
| Wk 2 | vs NYG | 7.0 | 35.5 | +28.5 |
| Wk 3 | @ DEN | 12.4 | — | — |
Each week's projection is the last one Let's Mock Draft published before that game kicked off, recorded at the time and never recalculated afterwards. The shaded band is the middle 80% of that week's simulated outcomes. Actual points are scored from official statistics under the scoring rule selected above.
Draft Return
How he compares with his draft price
The draft market had him at WR19. For the rest of the season LMD has him 14 spots higher, at WR5.
Preseason market: WR19 · ADP 36.2
Season to date
Ranking what he has actually scored needs every player's season, and that board is not published yet.
Rest of season
WR5 +14
LMD has him 14 spots higher than his WR19 draft price.
Week 3
WR6 +13
LMD has him 13 spots higher than his WR19 draft price.
Half PPR scoring · benchmark September 9, 2026
Season to date is what he has actually scored, ranked among his position. Rest of season and this week are LMD's current expectations rather than results. All three are compared with where the draft market had him before the season started.
WR19 is where Fantasy Football Calculator had him on September 9, 2026, the last board taken before the season's first kickoff. Later boards absorb what has happened since, so they are a current market rather than a draft price.
Regular season
Why LMD has him here
We project 187.5 points this season, WR5. Top 3: 14% · Top 12: 64% · Top 24: 90% of simulated seasons. That is 12.4 a game over 15 remaining games. Up 23 since the Sept. 20 board.
Per game
12.4 / game
Over 15 remaining game(s)
Finishing odds
Top 3: 14% · Top 12: 64% · Top 24: 90%
Share of simulated seasons finishing inside that place at WR
Market input
none
No market signal available.
LMD Rankings, rankings-v1.3.0. Inputs: Ball Don't Lie (fantasy market, player status, projections). · 2026 Rest of season board updated September 22, 2026
Dynasty
Long-term value
LMD's dynasty model has Davante Adams #63 in 1QB and #68 in Superflex, WR22 at his position. Age 33.
1QB
#63
WR22 · tier 17 · of 297
Superflex
#68
WR22 · tier 13 · of 303
- Last season 192.9 pts 13.8 per game, half-PPR scoring, in the games he played.
- Availability 86% Share of his team's games he played over the seasons the model reads.
- History 3 seasons Seasons of production the model read; more history is weighed more confidently.
- Touches 9.2 / game Carries plus receptions per game; 28% of his team's targets.
LMD dynasty model 1.2.0: a 3-season projection from observed NFL statistics, priced above a lineup's replacement level. Our own ranking, not an ADP, a consensus or a market price. Updated September 2026.
Draft season Draft position and availability
ADP, draft range, availability at a pick and who goes around him, measured over 10,000 simulated 12-team Half PPR 1QB drafts.
Simulated draft position
Where he goes
Simulation average
4.06
pick 42.1 overall, averaged over every simulated draft
Median pick
4.06
half of simulations take him by pick 42
Draft range
3.09 - 5.03
the middle 80% of simulations (P10-P90)
Simulations
10,000
drafted in every one
Filters
League format
Availability
Odds he reaches your pick
Available at 4.06 in 55% of simulations
Pick 42 overall in a 12-team draft · 10,000 simulations
From draft slot 7, the same seat picks again at 5.07, where he is available in 4% of simulations.
Slot 7's remaining turns: 4.06 55% · 5.07 4% · 6.06 <1% · 7.07 <1% · 8.06 0%
The middle half of simulations take him between 4.02 and 4.11.
| Pick | Available |
|---|---|
| 4.04 | 67% |
| 4.05 | 61% |
| 4.06 | 55% |
| 4.07 | 49% |
| 4.08 | 43% |
| 4.09 | 37% |
| 4.10 | 31% |
| 4.11 | 26% |
| 4.12 | 20% |
| 5.01 | 16% |
| 5.02 | 13% |
| 5.03 | 10% |
| 5.04 | 8% |
| 5.05 | 6% |
| 5.06 | 5% |
Distribution
Draft position distribution
| Pick | Share of simulations | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 3.09 | 2% | 178 of 10000 simulations |
| 3.10 | 2% | 226 of 10000 simulations |
| 3.11 | 3% | 268 of 10000 simulations |
| 3.12 | 3% | 349 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.01 | 4% | 382 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.02 | 5% | 468 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.03 | 5% | 503 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.04 | 6% | 559 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.05 | 6% | 615 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.06 | 6% | 591 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.07 | 6% | 611 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.08 | 6% | 606 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.09 | 6% | 579 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.10 | 6% | 553 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.11 | 6% | 561 of 10000 simulations |
| 4.12 | 4% | 419 of 10000 simulations |
| 5.01 | 3% | 335 of 10000 simulations |
| 5.02 | 3% | 273 of 10000 simulations |
| 5.03 | 2% | 231 of 10000 simulations |
Draft context
Who goes around him
Measured over the 10000 simulations in which Davante Adams was drafted.
Usually taken just before
- Ladd McConkey WR · LAC 5%
- Emeka Egbuka WR · TB 5%
- Brock Bowers TE · LV 4%
- Trey McBride TE · ARI 4%
Usually taken just after
- Ladd McConkey WR · LAC 5%
- Emeka Egbuka WR · TB 5%
- Trey McBride TE · ARI 5%
- Jaylen Waddle WR · DEN 4%
Methodology
How this is measured
Every figure on this page comes from a Monte Carlo batch of 10,000 simulated 12-team Half PPR 1QB drafts, each one played out pick by pick by the same simulated managers that fill an empty seat in a live room.
Davante Adams was selected in 10000 of those 10000 drafts. Every probability here rests on that count.
Each player's expected draft position starts from Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP as of September 17, 2026; the simulated managers move him from there. Players it does not price keep a price inferred from our own rankings.
A reach or a fall on this page is measured against Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP where it prices a player, and against a price inferred from our own rankings where it does not.
- Simulation model
- simulation-v1.2
- Generated
- September 17, 2026
- Player dataset
- nflverse-2026@8a41b71bb222a352
- Baseline
- mixed
- Market prior
- ADP data from Fantasy Football Calculator (2026-09-17)
Next
Draft it yourself
Draft against the same simulated managers that produced these numbers.
