NFL · 2026 Week 4
2026 Week 4 Half PPR RB Rankings
Final pre-kickoff board · published October 1, 2026, 20:25 UTC · first kickoff October 2, 2026, 00:15 UTC
Half PPR, 1QB · 97 players projected · updated October 1, 2026
How these rankings work
How these rankings are built
We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.
We then update those expectations for Week 4 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.
We then simulate the week 4,000 times and rank players by the projected fantasy points those simulations produce.
This board is priced in Half PPR. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.
What the percentages mean
For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.
- Top 3
- how often he finishes among the top three at his position
- Top 12
- how often he finishes in the top 12
- Top 24
- how often he finishes in the top 24
A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.
How often a strong start lasts
Since 1999, 58% of RBs inside the top 12 through Week 3 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 324 RB-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.
What stood out in Week 4
97 RBs ranked for Week 4. Jahmyr Gibbs leads at 21.0 projected points.
Tier breaks
2.0 projected points separate RB1 Jahmyr Gibbs from RB2 Bijan Robinson.
1.8 projected points separate RB2 Bijan Robinson from RB3 Derrick Henry.
Biggest differences from the draft market
Ahead
- Emanuel WilsonRB41Sportsbooks pricing him above our baseline +26 vs. RB67
- Braelon AllenRB28Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 2% · Top 12: 16% · Top 24: 38% +21 vs. RB49
- Aaron JonesRB14Sportsbooks pricing him above our baselineTop 3: 10% · Top 12: 33% · Top 24: 58% +17 vs. RB31
Behind
- Omarion HamptonRB22Sportsbooks pricing him below our baselineTop 3: 4% · Top 12: 23% · Top 24: 48% -10 vs. RB12
- MarShawn LloydRB43Sportsbooks pricing him below our baseline -9 vs. RB34
- Jadarian PriceRB31Sportsbooks pricing him below our baselineTop 3: 2% · Top 12: 14% · Top 24: 34% -6 vs. RB25
Movement
Risers
- Braelon AllenRB28Top 3: 2% · Top 12: 16% · Top 24: 38% ↑ 22
- Jaylen WarrenRB11Top 3: 10% · Top 12: 38% · Top 24: 63% ↑ 12
- Aaron JonesRB14Top 3: 10% · Top 12: 33% · Top 24: 58% ↑ 12
Fallers
- Omarion HamptonRB22Top 3: 4% · Top 12: 23% · Top 24: 48% ↓ 7
- Bucky IrvingRB18Top 3: 7% · Top 12: 31% · Top 24: 56% ↓ 5
- Saquon BarkleyRB19Top 3: 8% · Top 12: 29% · Top 24: 53% ↓ 5
Positional movement since the final Week 3 board, among players inside RB36 either week. Players not ranked at their position then are excluded.
| # | Pos | Player | Pos rank | Proj | Outcome profile | Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RB | Jahmyr GibbsDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 30% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 12%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB7 at the median, RB3 - RB16 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB27 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 30%Top 12: 68%Top 24: 88% |
RB1— | 21.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 30% of the time, 4th to 12th 38%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 12%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB7 at the median, RB3 - RB16 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB27 in the middle 80%. | |
| 2 | RB | Bijan RobinsonATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 23% of the time, 4th to 12th 39%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB9 at the median, RB4 - RB18 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB30 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 23%Top 12: 62%Top 24: 84% |
RB2↑ 3 | 19.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 23% of the time, 4th to 12th 39%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB9 at the median, RB4 - RB18 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB30 in the middle 80%. | |
| 3 | RB | Derrick HenryBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 22%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 19%Top 12: 55%Top 24: 78% |
RB3↑ 1 | 17.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 22%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%. | |
| 4 | RB | Jonathan TaylorIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 23%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 19%Top 12: 53%Top 24: 77% |
RB4↓ 1 | 17.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 23%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%. | |
| 5 | RB | Kenneth Walker IIIKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 18% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 20%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB33 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 18%Top 12: 53%Top 24: 80% |
RB5↓ 3 | 17.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 18% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 20%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB33 in the middle 80%. | |
| 6 | RB | Christian McCaffreySF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 21%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 16%Top 12: 53%Top 24: 79% |
RB6↑ 1 | 16.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 36%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 21%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%. | |
| 7 | RB | James CookBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB7 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 45%Top 24: 73% |
RB7↓ 1 | 15.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 32%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB7 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%. | |
| 8 | RB | Ashton JeantyLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 32%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB8 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB39 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 39%Top 24: 68% |
RB8— | 13.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 32%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB8 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB39 in the middle 80%. | |
| 9 | RB | Chase BrownCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB40 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 39%Top 24: 65% |
RB9↑ 1 | 13.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB40 in the middle 80%. | |
| 10 | RB | D'Andre SwiftCHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 39%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB8 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 37%Top 24: 61% |
RB10↑ 2 | 13.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 39%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB8 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB46 in the middle 80%. | |
| 11 | RB | Jaylen WarrenPITQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 38%Top 24: 63% |
RB11↑ 12 | 13.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | |
| 12 | RB | Jeremiyah LoveARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 36%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 37%Top 24: 64% |
RB12↑ 7 | 13.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 36%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | |
| 13 | RB | Cam SkatteboNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB9 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 37%Top 24: 65% |
RB13↑ 4 | 13.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 28%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB9 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | |
| 14 | RB | Aaron JonesMINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB9 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 33%Top 24: 58% |
RB14↑ 12 | 12.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB9 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB47 in the middle 80%. | |
| 15 | RB | Chuba HubbardCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 36%Top 24: 63% |
RB15↑ 5 | 12.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | |
| 16 | RB | Javonte WilliamsDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 39%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB33 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 35%Top 24: 61% |
RB16— | 12.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 39%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB33 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | |
| 17 | RB | Kyren WilliamsLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 32%Top 24: 58% |
RB17↑ 1 | 12.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | |
| 18 | RB | Bucky IrvingTBQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB10 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 31%Top 24: 56% |
RB18↓ 5 | 12.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB10 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | |
| 19 | RB | Saquon BarkleyPHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 47%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 53% |
RB19↓ 5 | 11.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 47%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB48 in the middle 80%. | |
| 20 | RB | Bhayshul TutenJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 25%Top 24: 50% |
RB20↑ 4 | 10.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB47 in the middle 80%. | |
| 21 | RB | Quinshon JudkinsCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB13 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB45 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 25%Top 24: 51% |
RB21↑ 4 | 10.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB13 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB45 in the middle 80%. | |
| 22 | RB | Omarion HamptonLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 52%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 48% |
RB22↓ 7 | 10.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 52%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB49 in the middle 80%. | |
| 23 | RB | David MontgomeryHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 23%Top 24: 47% |
RB23↓ 1 | 10.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 19%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 53%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB51 in the middle 80%. | |
| 24 | RB | Tony PollardTENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 4%Top 12: 19%Top 24: 41% |
RB24↑ 6 | 9.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 4% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB55 in the middle 80%. | |
| 25 | RB | Jacory Croskey-MerrittWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB53 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 41% |
RB25↑ 7 | 9.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB53 in the middle 80%. | |
| 26 | RB | Alvin KamaraNOQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 38% |
RB26↑ 8 | 8.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB60 in the middle 80%. | |
| 27 | RB | Rhamondre StevensonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB17 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 41% |
RB27↑ 2 | 8.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB17 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB52 in the middle 80%. | |
| 28 | RB | Braelon AllenNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB54 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 38% |
RB28↑ 22 | 8.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB54 in the middle 80%. | |
| 29 | RB | TreVeyon HendersonNEQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB18 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 35% |
RB29↓ 2 | 8.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB18 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | |
| 30 | RB | J.K. DobbinsDENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB18 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 36% |
RB30↑ 10 | 8.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB18 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB60 in the middle 80%. | |
| 31 | RB | Jadarian PriceSEAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB36 at the median, RB19 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB61 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 34% |
RB31↓ 3 | 8.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB36 at the median, RB19 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB61 in the middle 80%. | |
| 32 | RB | RJ HarveyDENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB20 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB64 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 32% |
RB32↑ 5 | 7.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB20 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB64 in the middle 80%. | |
| 33 | RB | Kyle MonangaiCHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB21 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB11 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 12%Top 24: 31% |
RB33↓ 2 | 7.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 69%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB21 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB11 - RB63 in the middle 80%. | |
| 34 | RB | Blake CorumLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB22 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 28% |
RB34↑ 1 | 7.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB22 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB56 in the middle 80%. | |
| 35 | RB | Rachaad WhiteWASQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB22 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 11%Top 24: 28% |
RB35↓ 2 | 7.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 10%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 72%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB22 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB67 in the middle 80%. | |
| 36 | RB | Woody MarksHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 27% |
RB36— | 7.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 18%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB60 in the middle 80%. | |
| 37 | RB | Ollie Gordon IIMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB24 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 9%Top 24: 26% |
RB37NEW | 6.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 8%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 74%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB40 at the median, RB24 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | |
| 38 | RB | Kenny GainwellTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB41 at the median, RB26 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB15 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 23% |
RB38↑ 3 | 6.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 77%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB41 at the median, RB26 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB15 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | |
| 39 | RB | Kendre MillerNOQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB27 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB15 - RB74 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 8%Top 24: 22% |
RB39↑ 38 | 6.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB27 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB15 - RB74 in the middle 80%. | |
| 40 | RB | Brian RobinsonATLQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB28 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB71 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 21% |
RB40↑ 7 | 5.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 79%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB28 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB71 in the middle 80%. | |
| 41 | RB | Emanuel WilsonSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB29 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 19% |
RB41↑ 5 | 5.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB29 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | |
| 42 | RB | Tyler AllgeierARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB31 - RB56 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB66 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 19% |
RB42— | 5.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB31 - RB56 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB66 in the middle 80%. | |
| 43 | RB | MarShawn LloydGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB30 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 18% |
RB43— | 5.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB30 - RB57 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB67 in the middle 80%. | |
| 44 | RB | Kalel MullingsTEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB31 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 18% |
RB44NEW | 5.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB31 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB80 in the middle 80%. | |
| 45 | RB | Carson SteelePHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB31 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 18% |
RB45NEW | 5.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB49 at the median, RB31 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB80 in the middle 80%. | |
| 46 | RB | Tyjae SpearsTENQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB34 - RB61 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 15% |
RB46↓ 7 | 5.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB34 - RB61 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB73 in the middle 80%. | |
| 47 | RB | Kaelon BlackSFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB36 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 14% |
RB47↓ 3 | 4.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB36 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB80 in the middle 80%. | |
| 48 | RB | Najee HarrisNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB38 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 13% |
RB48↑ 6 | 4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 87%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB38 - RB67 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | |
| 49 | RB | Emmett JohnsonKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB39 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB76 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 12% |
RB49↓ 1 | 4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB39 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB76 in the middle 80%. | |
| 50 | RB | Kaleb JohnsonGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB41 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB77 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% |
RB50↑ 7 | 4.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB54 at the median, RB41 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB77 in the middle 80%. | |
| 51 | RB | Isaiah DavisNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB40 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 12% |
RB51NEW | 4.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 88%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB40 - RB68 in the middle half, and RB22 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | |
| 52 | RB | Chris Rodriguez Jr.JAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB41 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB82 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% |
RB52— | 4.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB41 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB82 in the middle 80%. | |
| 53 | RB | Keaton MitchellLACQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB43 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% |
RB53↑ 5 | 3.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB43 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB84 in the middle 80%. | |
| 54 | RB | Justice HillBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB43 - RB69 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 9% |
RB54↓ 1 | 3.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB43 - RB69 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | |
| 55 | RB | Samaje PerineCINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB43 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% |
RB55↑ 1 | 3.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB43 - RB71 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB84 in the middle 80%. | |
| 56 | RB | Raheim SandersCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB45 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB80 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 8% |
RB56↑ 7 | 3.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB45 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB80 in the middle 80%. | |
| 57 | RB | George HolaniSEAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB45 - RB76 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB89 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 10% |
RB57↑ 4 | 3.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB45 - RB76 in the middle half, and RB25 - RB89 in the middle 80%. | |
| 58 | RB | Mike Washington Jr.LV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB47 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB85 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 8% |
RB58↑ 2 | 3.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB47 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB85 in the middle 80%. | |
| 59 | RB | Ty JohnsonBUFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB65 at the median, RB47 - RB82 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB97 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% |
RB59— | 3.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB65 at the median, RB47 - RB82 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB97 in the middle 80%. | |
| 60 | RB | Jaylen WrightMIAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB63 at the median, RB47 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB92 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 7% |
RB60↑ 39 | 3.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB63 at the median, RB47 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB92 in the middle 80%. | |
| 61 | RB | Tank BigsbyPHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB51 - RB82 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% |
RB61↓ 12 | 3.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB51 - RB82 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB95 in the middle 80%. | |
| 62 | RB | Chris BrooksGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB51 - RB76 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB87 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB62↓ 11 | 3.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB51 - RB76 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB87 in the middle 80%. | |
| 63 | RB | Tyler GoodsonDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB66 at the median, RB51 - RB81 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB94 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% |
RB63↑ 16 | 3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB66 at the median, RB51 - RB81 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB94 in the middle 80%. | |
| 64 | RB | AJ DillonCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB66 at the median, RB53 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB89 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB64↑ 2 | 3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB66 at the median, RB53 - RB79 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB89 in the middle 80%. | |
| 65 | RB | Sione VakiDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB54 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB91 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB65↑ 4 | 2.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB54 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB91 in the middle 80%. | |
| 66 | RB | Will ShipleyPHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB52 - RB83 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB66↓ 1 | 2.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB67 at the median, RB52 - RB83 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB96 in the middle 80%. | |
| 67 | RB | DJ GiddensIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB54 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB100 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% |
RB67↓ 3 | 2.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB54 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB100 in the middle 80%. | |
| 68 | RB | Devin SingletaryNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB55 - RB85 in the middle half, and RB33 - RB96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% |
RB68↓ 13 | 2.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB71 at the median, RB55 - RB85 in the middle half, and RB33 - RB96 in the middle 80%. | |
| 69 | RB | Kaytron AllenWASQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB56 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB102 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% |
RB69↓ 2 | 2.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB56 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB102 in the middle 80%. | |
| 70 | RB | Kene NwangwuNYJQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB58 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB106 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB70↑ 13 | 2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB58 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB106 in the middle 80%. | |
| 71 | RB | Kimani VidalLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB60 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB71↑ 5 | 2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB60 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB98 in the middle 80%. | |
| 72 | RB | Tyler BadieDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB60 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB72NEW | 2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB60 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB98 in the middle 80%. | |
| 73 | RB | Bam KnightARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB61 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB73↑ 29 | 2.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB61 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB45 - RB103 in the middle 80%. | |
| 74 | RB | Anthony Tyus IIICAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB62 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB74NEW | 2.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB62 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB42 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | |
| 75 | RB | Ray DavisBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB63 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB102 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% |
RB75↓ 2 | 2.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB63 - RB91 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB102 in the middle 80%. | |
| 76 | RB | Kyle JuszczykSFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB62 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB37 - RB107 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% |
RB76↓ 8 | 2.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB62 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB37 - RB107 in the middle 80%. | |
| 77 | RB | Ameer AbdullahJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB65 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB101 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB77↓ 15 | 2.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB65 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB101 in the middle 80%. | |
| 78 | RB | Corey KinerNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB68 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB78NEW | 2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB68 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | |
| 79 | RB | Lan LarisonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB68 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB79NEW | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB68 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB111 in the middle 80%. | |
| 80 | RB | Sean TuckerTBQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB68 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB80NEW | 1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB68 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 81 | RB | Cody SchraderDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB69 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB81NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB69 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 82 | RB | Eric GrayCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB69 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB82↑ 5 | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB69 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 83 | RB | Jaydon BluePHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB69 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB113 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB83NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB69 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB52 - RB113 in the middle 80%. | |
| 84 | RB | Zamir WhiteNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB69 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB84NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB69 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | |
| 85 | RB | Dare OgunbowaleLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB69 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB85↑ 3 | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB86 at the median, RB69 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB111 in the middle 80%. | |
| 86 | RB | Zavier ScottCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB86NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 87 | RB | Velus Jones Jr.SEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB87NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 88 | RB | Devin NealNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB113 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB88↑ 4 | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB113 in the middle 80%. | |
| 89 | RB | Jawhar JordanHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% |
RB89NEW | 1.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB70 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 90 | RB | LeQuint Allen Jr.JAXQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB71 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB54 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB90NEW | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB71 - RB102 in the middle half, and RB54 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | |
| 91 | RB | Travis HomerPIT Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB73 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB56 - RB110 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB91↑ 7 | 1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB73 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB56 - RB110 in the middle 80%. | |
| 92 | RB | Seth McGowanIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB79 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB61 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB92NEW | 1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB79 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB61 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | |
| 93 | RB | CJ DonaldsonNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB79 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB64 - RB111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB93↓ 21 | 1.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB79 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB64 - RB111 in the middle 80%. | |
| 94 | RB | DeeJay DallasMINQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB93 at the median, RB78 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB94↓ 10 | 1.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB93 at the median, RB78 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | |
| 95 | RB | Amar JohnsonLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB81 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB119 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB95↓ 17 | 1.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB81 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB119 in the middle 80%. | |
| 96 | RB | Josh WilliamsTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB79 - RB108 in the middle half, and RB61 - RB116 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB96NEW | 1.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB79 - RB108 in the middle half, and RB61 - RB116 in the middle 80%. | |
| 97 | RB | Demond ClaiborneMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB81 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB65 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% |
RB97NEW | 1.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB81 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB65 - RB114 in the middle 80%. |
Simulated finishes
This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.
Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.
Week 4 RB outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.
-
RB1 Jahmyr GibbsRB7Jahmyr Gibbs is ranked RB1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB7 at the median, RB3 - RB16 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB27 in the middle 80%.
-
RB2 Bijan RobinsonRB9Bijan Robinson is ranked RB2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB9 at the median, RB4 - RB18 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB30 in the middle 80%.
-
RB3 Derrick HenryRB11Derrick Henry is ranked RB3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
-
RB4 Jonathan TaylorRB11Jonathan Taylor is ranked RB4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB35 in the middle 80%.
-
RB11Kenneth Walker III is ranked RB5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB33 in the middle 80%.
-
RB12Christian McCaffrey is ranked RB6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB5 - RB22 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB34 in the middle 80%.
-
RB7 James CookRB14James Cook is ranked RB7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB14 at the median, RB7 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB38 in the middle 80%.
-
RB8 Ashton JeantyRB16Ashton Jeanty is ranked RB8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB8 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB39 in the middle 80%.
-
RB9 Chase BrownRB17Chase Brown is ranked RB9 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB40 in the middle 80%.
-
RB10 D'Andre SwiftRB19D'Andre Swift is ranked RB10 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB8 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
-
RB11 Jaylen WarrenRB17Jaylen Warren is ranked RB11 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
RB12 Jeremiyah LoveRB18Jeremiyah Love is ranked RB12 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
RB13 Cam SkatteboRB17Cam Skattebo is ranked RB13 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB9 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
RB14 Aaron JonesRB20Aaron Jones is ranked RB14 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB9 - RB35 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
-
RB15 Chuba HubbardRB18Chuba Hubbard is ranked RB15 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB9 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
RB16 Javonte WilliamsRB19Javonte Williams is ranked RB16 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB33 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
RB17 Kyren WilliamsRB20Kyren Williams is ranked RB17 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB10 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
RB18 Bucky IrvingRB21Bucky Irving is ranked RB18 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB21 at the median, RB10 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
RB19 Saquon BarkleyRB23Saquon Barkley is ranked RB19 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB48 in the middle 80%.
-
RB20 Bhayshul TutenRB24Bhayshul Tuten is ranked RB20 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB12 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
-
RB21 Quinshon JudkinsRB24Quinshon Judkins is ranked RB21 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB13 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB45 in the middle 80%.
-
RB22 Omarion HamptonRB26Omarion Hampton is ranked RB22 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
-
RB23 David MontgomeryRB26David Montgomery is ranked RB23 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB26 at the median, RB13 - RB41 in the middle half, and RB7 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
-
RB24 Tony PollardRB30Tony Pollard is ranked RB24 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB55 in the middle 80%.
Show RB25 - RB36
-
RB30Jacory Croskey-Merritt is ranked RB25 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB43 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB53 in the middle 80%.
-
RB26 Alvin KamaraRB33Alvin Kamara is ranked RB26 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
-
RB27 Rhamondre StevensonRB30Rhamondre Stevenson is ranked RB27 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB17 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
-
RB28 Braelon AllenRB33Braelon Allen is ranked RB28 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB33 at the median, RB17 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB54 in the middle 80%.
-
RB29 TreVeyon HendersonRB35TreVeyon Henderson is ranked RB29 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB18 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
-
RB30 J.K. DobbinsRB34J.K. Dobbins is ranked RB30 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB18 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
-
RB31 Jadarian PriceRB36Jadarian Price is ranked RB31 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB36 at the median, RB19 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB61 in the middle 80%.
-
RB32 RJ HarveyRB37RJ Harvey is ranked RB32 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB20 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB64 in the middle 80%.
-
RB33 Kyle MonangaiRB38Kyle Monangai is ranked RB33 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB38 at the median, RB21 - RB51 in the middle half, and RB11 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
-
RB34 Blake CorumRB37Blake Corum is ranked RB34 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB22 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
-
RB35 Rachaad WhiteRB39Rachaad White is ranked RB35 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB22 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
-
RB36 Woody MarksRB39Woody Marks is ranked RB36 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB23 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB13 - RB60 in the middle 80%.
Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.
The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.
How these are made
This board was built from 2026 usage for 72% of the board, draft position for 100%, an outside projection for 59%, sportsbook props for 69%, an official status for 82%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Half PPR, 1QB.
Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured October 1, 2026 20:23 UTC. Movement is previous - current; positive means the player moved up the board (a smaller rank number), measured in positional rank against the final Week 3 board generated before that week's first kickoff (September 24, 2026). Model rankings-v1.4.1, board captured 2026-10-01.
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
