NFL · 2026 Week 9
2026 Week 9 Full PPR RB Rankings
Final pre-kickoff board · published November 5, 2026, 18:08 UTC · first kickoff November 6, 2026, 01:15 UTC
Full PPR, 1QB · 101 players projected · updated November 5, 2026
How these rankings work
How these rankings are built
We start with preseason player projections and draft position — where players were being selected in fantasy drafts entering the season.
We then update those expectations for Week 9 using recent usage, availability and market signals. Market signals are current sportsbook and prediction-market prices that can reflect changing expectations for a player's workload, performance, or availability.
We then simulate the week 4,000 times. The projected fantasy points those simulations produce set the order and the tiers.
This board is priced in Full PPR. The order and the finish percentages below are specific to it: another format is a separate simulation of the same projections, not this table with new points.
How the tiers work
Players are grouped into tiers at each position by projected fantasy points. A new tier starts where the projections separate, not after a set number of players, so tiers vary in size and a player who stands apart can be a tier on his own.
The breaks come from the best grouping of each position's projections, the method behind Jenks natural breaks, with gaps judged against how widely weekly scores vary at that position. The rule is the same every week and nobody places players by hand.
Within a tier, players are listed by projected points, but the gaps between them are small. They shouldn't decide a start/sit on their own.
A tier's band is the range of its players' projected points. It isn't a range of outcomes.
A player's 80% range is the middle of his simulated scores: the model puts 10% of outcomes below it and 10% above. Real scores can land outside it.
Players in neighbouring tiers often have overlapping ranges. A higher tier means more projected points, not a guarantee of outscoring everyone below it.
What the percentages mean
For every simulation, we also record where each player finishes at his position.
- Top 3
- how often he finishes among the top three at his position
- Top 12
- how often he finishes in the top 12
- Top 24
- how often he finishes in the top 24
A WR with a 58% Top 12 rate finished as a top-12 WR in 58% of the simulated weeks.
How often a strong start lasts
Since 1999, 71% of RBs inside the top 12 through Week 8 finished the season inside the top 12. Measured over 326 RB-seasons from 1999-2025, in the same scoring rule as this board.
What stood out in Week 9
101 RBs in 12 tiers for Week 9. Jahmyr Gibbs leads at 22.9 projected points.
Tiers break where projected points separate, and the differences inside a tier are small. Each 80% range is the middle 80% of that player's simulated scores; real scores can fall outside it.
| Pos | Player | Proj | Outcome profile | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 22.9 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Jahmyr GibbsDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 29% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB8 at the median, RB3 - RB18 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB31 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 29%Top 12: 64%Top 24: 84% 80% range: 8.8 - 40.6 |
22.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 29% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 16%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB8 at the median, RB3 - RB18 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB31 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 2 18.3 - 19.5 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Christian McCaffreySFQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 21% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB13 at the median, RB5 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 21%Top 12: 49%Top 24: 73% 80% range: 6.1 - 37.0 |
19.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 21% of the time, 4th to 12th 28%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 27%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB13 at the median, RB5 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kenneth Walker IIIKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 23%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 19%Top 12: 53%Top 24: 77% 80% range: 7.3 - 34.5 |
19.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 19% of the time, 4th to 12th 34%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 23%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Bijan RobinsonATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 25%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB6 - RB24 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 16%Top 12: 50%Top 24: 75% 80% range: 7.3 - 32.1 |
18.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 16% of the time, 4th to 12th 35%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 25%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB6 - RB24 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 3 15.7 - 16.8 projected points | |||||||
| RB | James Cook IIIBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 43%Top 24: 69% 80% range: 6.2 - 30.4 |
16.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Chuba HubbardCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 12%Top 12: 44%Top 24: 70% 80% range: 6.3 - 30.1 |
16.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 12% of the time, 4th to 12th 31%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 30%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB42 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | D'Andre SwiftCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB6 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 13%Top 12: 43%Top 24: 69% 80% range: 6.2 - 30.0 |
16.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 13% of the time, 4th to 12th 30%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 31%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB6 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kyren WilliamsLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 40%Top 24: 65% 80% range: 5.9 - 28.1 |
15.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 35%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB44 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jonathan TaylorIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 34%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB8 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 39%Top 24: 66% 80% range: 5.9 - 27.4 |
15.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 29%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 34%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB8 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB44 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 4 14.3 - 15.2 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Chase BrownCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 10%Top 12: 36%Top 24: 63% 80% range: 5.9 - 27.5 |
15.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 10% of the time, 4th to 12th 27%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 37%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB44 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Josh JacobsGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB8 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 11%Top 12: 35%Top 24: 58% 80% range: 4.4 - 28.9 |
14.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 11% of the time, 4th to 12th 24%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 42%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB8 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB51 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Javonte WilliamsDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 38%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 35%Top 24: 62% 80% range: 5.3 - 27.1 |
14.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 38%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB47 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Bucky IrvingTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 40%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 34%Top 24: 60% 80% range: 5.6 - 26.1 |
14.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 26%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 40%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB46 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ashton JeantyLV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 30%, and outside the top 24 38%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB10 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 32%Top 24: 62% 80% range: 5.9 - 25.4 |
14.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 25%, 13th to 24th 30%, and outside the top 24 38%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB10 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB43 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 5 13.1 - 13.4 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Breece HallNYJQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB11 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 9%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 51% 80% range: 3.7 - 26.7 |
13.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 9% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 49%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB11 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB58 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Quinshon JudkinsCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 45%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 55% 80% range: 5.0 - 24.5 |
13.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 45%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ollie Gordon IIMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 29%Top 24: 54% 80% range: 4.5 - 25.2 |
13.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB52 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Braelon AllenNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB36 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 56% 80% range: 5.2 - 23.6 |
13.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 44%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB36 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB47 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Rhamondre StevensonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 45%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 55% 80% range: 5.2 - 23.7 |
13.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 23%, 13th to 24th 27%, and outside the top 24 45%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB47 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Derrick HenryBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 54% 80% range: 4.8 - 23.9 |
13.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 22%, 13th to 24th 26%, and outside the top 24 46%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB50 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jonah ColemanDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 7%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 52% 80% range: 4.4 - 24.6 |
13.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 7% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 24%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB52 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Cam SkatteboNYGQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB11 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 8%Top 12: 28%Top 24: 52% 80% range: 3.9 - 25.3 |
13.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 8% of the time, 4th to 12th 21%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 48%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB11 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB56 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 6 11.2 - 12.3 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Woody MarksHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB25 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 25%Top 24: 50% 80% range: 4.6 - 22.6 |
12.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 20%, 13th to 24th 25%, and outside the top 24 50%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB25 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB51 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Saquon BarkleyPHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 57%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB14 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB61 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 5%Top 12: 22%Top 24: 43% 80% range: 3.4 - 22.2 |
11.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 5% of the time, 4th to 12th 17%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 57%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB14 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB61 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kyle MonangaiCHIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB15 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 22%Top 24: 41% 80% range: 2.7 - 22.9 |
11.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 16%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB15 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 7 9.2 - 10.5 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Tyler AllgeierARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB54 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 17%Top 24: 41% 80% range: 4.1 - 19.0 |
10.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 15%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB54 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Bhayshul TutenJAXQQuestionable · projection includes a 71% chance of playing Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB13 - RB129 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB129 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 6%Top 12: 24%Top 24: 41% 80% range: 0.0 - 23.8 |
10.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 6% of the time, 4th to 12th 18%, 13th to 24th 17%, and outside the top 24 59%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB13 - RB129 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB129 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Rachaad WhiteWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 38% 80% range: 3.6 - 19.3 |
10.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 14%, 13th to 24th 21%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB58 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Emanuel WilsonSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB18 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 38% 80% range: 3.5 - 18.9 |
10.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 23%, and outside the top 24 62%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB18 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB59 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Alvin KamaraNOQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB18 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 16%Top 24: 35% 80% range: 3.1 - 19.3 |
9.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 65%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB18 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB63 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Blake CorumLAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB19 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 15%Top 24: 36% 80% range: 3.6 - 18.4 |
9.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 22%, and outside the top 24 64%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB19 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB59 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jadarian PriceSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB19 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 15%Top 24: 34% 80% range: 3.3 - 18.5 |
9.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 13%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB19 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB62 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Zach CharbonnetSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB36 at the median, RB19 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 3%Top 12: 15%Top 24: 34% 80% range: 2.7 - 19.2 |
9.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 3% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB36 at the median, RB19 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB67 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Aaron Jones Sr.MIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB19 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 14%Top 24: 34% 80% range: 3.5 - 17.6 |
9.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 12%, 13th to 24th 20%, and outside the top 24 66%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB19 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB59 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jordan MasonMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB20 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB65 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 2%Top 12: 13%Top 24: 32% 80% range: 3.0 - 17.5 |
9.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 2% of the time, 4th to 12th 11%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 68%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB20 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB65 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 8 7.3 - 8.5 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Omarion HamptonLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB22 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB64 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 30% 80% range: 3.0 - 16.0 |
8.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 19%, and outside the top 24 70%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB22 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB64 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kenny GainwellTBQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB41 at the median, RB23 - RB56 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 10%Top 24: 27% 80% range: 2.7 - 16.0 |
8.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 9%, 13th to 24th 16%, and outside the top 24 73%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB41 at the median, RB23 - RB56 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kendre MillerNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB27 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB14 - RB70 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 8%Top 24: 22% 80% range: 2.5 - 14.8 |
7.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 7%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB27 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB14 - RB70 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Dylan SampsonCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB28 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB71 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 20% 80% range: 2.4 - 14.0 |
7.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 13%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB45 at the median, RB28 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB71 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | J.K. DobbinsDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB27 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB70 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 22% 80% range: 2.5 - 13.8 |
7.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 78%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB27 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB70 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 9 5.7 - 7.0 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Mike Washington Jr.LV Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB28 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB71 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 20% 80% range: 2.5 - 13.6 |
7.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 15%, and outside the top 24 80%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB28 - RB60 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB71 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kimani VidalLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB30 - RB61 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB71 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 18% 80% range: 2.5 - 13.3 |
6.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 82%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB30 - RB61 in the middle half, and RB17 - RB71 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kaelon BlackSF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB29 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB72 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 2.4 - 13.3 |
6.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 14%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB48 at the median, RB29 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB72 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | TreVeyon HendersonNEQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB29 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB79 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 7%Top 24: 19% 80% range: 1.9 - 13.9 |
6.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 6%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 81%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB29 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB16 - RB79 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Emmett JohnsonKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB32 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB70 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 17% 80% range: 2.5 - 12.5 |
6.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB47 at the median, RB32 - RB59 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB70 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Justice HillBAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB32 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 2.7 - 12.1 |
6.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 12%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB46 at the median, RB32 - RB58 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB68 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Brian Robinson Jr.ATLQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB31 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 17% 80% range: 1.7 - 13.0 |
6.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 83%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB31 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB83 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Devin SingletaryNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB33 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB77 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 2.0 - 12.6 |
6.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB51 at the median, RB33 - RB65 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB77 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | MarShawn LloydGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB32 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB75 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 2.2 - 12.2 |
6.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB32 - RB63 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB75 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Keaton MitchellLAC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB33 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB73 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 4%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 2.3 - 12.0 |
6.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 11%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB50 at the median, RB33 - RB62 in the middle half, and RB20 - RB73 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jam MillerATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB34 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB88 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 6%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 1.5 - 12.6 |
5.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 5%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB34 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB18 - RB88 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Bam KnightARIQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB35 - RB72 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB86 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 1%Top 12: 5%Top 24: 15% 80% range: 1.6 - 12.5 |
5.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 1% of the time, 4th to 12th 4%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 85%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB55 at the median, RB35 - RB72 in the middle half, and RB19 - RB86 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Chris Rodriguez Jr.JAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB34 - RB69 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 14% 80% range: 1.8 - 11.4 |
5.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 10%, and outside the top 24 86%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB56 at the median, RB34 - RB69 in the middle half, and RB21 - RB81 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 10 4.4 - 5.5 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Ty JohnsonBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB39 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB77 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% 80% range: 2.0 - 10.8 |
5.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB53 at the median, RB39 - RB66 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB77 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Samaje PerineCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB37 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB81 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 11% 80% range: 1.8 - 10.9 |
5.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 9%, and outside the top 24 89%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB57 at the median, RB37 - RB70 in the middle half, and RB23 - RB81 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Tyler GoodsonDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB40 - RB72 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB83 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10% 80% range: 1.7 - 10.7 |
5.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB58 at the median, RB40 - RB72 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB83 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Elijah MitchellPHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB41 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB88 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 3%Top 24: 10% 80% range: 1.5 - 10.5 |
5.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 3%, 13th to 24th 8%, and outside the top 24 90%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB59 at the median, RB41 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB24 - RB88 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kyle JuszczykSF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB44 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB85 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% 80% range: 1.7 - 10.0 |
4.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB60 at the median, RB44 - RB73 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB85 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Seth McGowanIND Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB44 - RB75 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB86 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 8% 80% range: 1.6 - 9.9 |
4.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB44 - RB75 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB86 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Roschon JohnsonCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB44 - RB75 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB87 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 9% 80% range: 1.5 - 10.0 |
4.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 7%, and outside the top 24 91%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB61 at the median, RB44 - RB75 in the middle half, and RB26 - RB87 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Andrew BeckNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB45 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB93 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 8% 80% range: 1.2 - 9.9 |
4.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 2%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 92%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB64 at the median, RB45 - RB80 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB93 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Sione VakiDET Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB63 at the median, RB47 - RB76 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB87 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 7% 80% range: 1.6 - 9.5 |
4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 6%, and outside the top 24 93%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB63 at the median, RB47 - RB76 in the middle half, and RB27 - RB87 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | George HolaniSEA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB62 at the median, RB48 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB84 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 6% 80% range: 1.7 - 9.2 |
4.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB62 at the median, RB48 - RB74 in the middle half, and RB29 - RB84 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 11 2.8 - 3.9 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Nate CarterKC Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB70 at the median, RB51 - RB86 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB99 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 2%Top 24: 6% 80% range: 1.0 - 8.7 |
3.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 5%, and outside the top 24 94%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB70 at the median, RB51 - RB86 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB99 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Austin EkelerWAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB69 at the median, RB53 - RB82 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB94 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% 80% range: 1.2 - 8.4 |
3.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB69 at the median, RB53 - RB82 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB94 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jaylen WrightMIAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB53 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB100 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% 80% range: 1.0 - 8.6 |
3.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB53 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB100 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Corey KinerNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB56 - RB85 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB95 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% 80% range: 1.2 - 8.6 |
3.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB56 - RB85 in the middle half, and RB31 - RB95 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Pierre Strong Jr.GB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB70 at the median, RB55 - RB84 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB96 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% 80% range: 1.2 - 7.9 |
3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB70 at the median, RB55 - RB84 in the middle half, and RB34 - RB96 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Evan HullARI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB55 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB102 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% 80% range: 0.9 - 8.4 |
3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB73 at the median, RB55 - RB89 in the middle half, and RB32 - RB102 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Phil MafahNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB56 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB33 - RB103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 5% 80% range: 0.9 - 8.2 |
3.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 4%, and outside the top 24 95%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB74 at the median, RB56 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB33 - RB103 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Audric EstiméNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB57 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB35 - RB103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.9 |
3.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB57 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB35 - RB103 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Eric GrayNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB58 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB37 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.4 |
3.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB76 at the median, RB58 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB37 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | CJ DonaldsonNOQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB59 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB101 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 4% 80% range: 1.0 - 7.6 |
3.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 3%, and outside the top 24 96%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB59 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB101 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Isaiah DavisNYJ Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB60 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB97 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 1.1 - 7.4 |
3.1 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB60 - RB87 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB97 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | DJ HermanMIA Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB60 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB104 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.3 |
3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB60 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB104 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jaleel McLaughlinCLE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB60 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB98 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 1.1 - 7.3 |
3.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB75 at the median, RB60 - RB88 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB98 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Lan LarisonNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB62 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.0 |
2.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB78 at the median, RB62 - RB92 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB103 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Anthony Tyus IIICAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB63 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.8 - 7.6 |
2.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB80 at the median, RB63 - RB94 in the middle half, and RB36 - RB105 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ray DavisBUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB63 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB100 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 1.0 - 7.2 |
2.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB77 at the median, RB63 - RB90 in the middle half, and RB39 - RB100 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Kaleb JohnsonGB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB79 at the median, RB64 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB103 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.9 - 7.2 |
2.8 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB79 at the median, RB64 - RB93 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB103 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| Tier 12 1.5 - 2.7 projected points | |||||||
| RB | Velus Jones Jr.SEAQQuestionable Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB64 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.6 - 7.2 |
2.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB64 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB38 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Khalil HerbertATL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB67 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.7 - 7.0 |
2.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB85 at the median, RB67 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB111 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Israel AbanikandaDAL Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB65 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB110 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 3% 80% range: 0.7 - 6.8 |
2.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 97%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB65 - RB99 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB110 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Demond ClaiborneMIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB67 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB105 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.8 - 4.8 |
2.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB83 at the median, RB67 - RB95 in the middle half, and RB49 - RB105 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jarquez HunterNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB66 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.7 - 5.0 |
2.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB66 - RB98 in the middle half, and RB48 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Josh WilliamsTB Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB71 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB113 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.6 - 7.0 |
2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB71 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB40 - RB113 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Zamir WhiteNO Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB89 at the median, RB70 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB41 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 1%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.6 - 6.8 |
2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 1%, 13th to 24th 2%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB89 at the median, RB70 - RB104 in the middle half, and RB41 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Trevor EtienneCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB69 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.8 - 5.3 |
2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB84 at the median, RB69 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB46 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jaret PattersonDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB66 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB108 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.7 - 4.7 |
2.4 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB82 at the median, RB66 - RB97 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB108 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | AJ DillonCAR Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB72 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 2% 80% range: 0.7 - 4.7 |
2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 98%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB72 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB50 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Tahj BrooksCIN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB72 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB109 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.7 - 6.6 |
2.3 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB87 at the median, RB72 - RB100 in the middle half, and RB44 - RB109 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Dare OgunbowaleHOU Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB72 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB53 - RB111 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.7 - 4.2 |
2.2 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB88 at the median, RB72 - RB101 in the middle half, and RB53 - RB111 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Cody SchraderDEN Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB93 at the median, RB76 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB54 - RB115 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.5 - 4.2 |
2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB93 at the median, RB76 - RB106 in the middle half, and RB54 - RB115 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Jordan JamesSF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB78 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB58 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.6 - 3.5 |
2.0 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB92 at the median, RB78 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB58 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Patrick RicardNYG Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB77 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB112 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.6 - 3.4 |
1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB91 at the median, RB77 - RB103 in the middle half, and RB60 - RB112 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Robert Henry Jr.WAS Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB76 - RB108 in the middle half, and RB56 - RB116 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.5 - 3.9 |
1.9 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB94 at the median, RB76 - RB108 in the middle half, and RB56 - RB116 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Terrell JenningsNE Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB82 - RB110 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB118 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.5 - 3.3 |
1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB82 - RB110 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB118 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Ameer AbdullahJAX Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB97 at the median, RB84 - RB107 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB114 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 0% 80% range: 0.6 - 2.9 |
1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB97 at the median, RB84 - RB107 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB114 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Sincere McCormickSF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB82 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB119 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.4 - 3.2 |
1.7 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB82 - RB111 in the middle half, and RB62 - RB119 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Salvon AhmedCHI Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB101 at the median, RB85 - RB112 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB120 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 1% 80% range: 0.4 - 2.8 |
1.6 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 1%, and outside the top 24 99%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB101 at the median, RB85 - RB112 in the middle half, and RB66 - RB120 in the middle 80%. | ||||
| RB | Frank Gore Jr.BUF Drivers show how expected points change when each signal is removed. Effects can overlap, so they do not add up to the final projection.
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?We don’t currently show matchup as a separate factor. We tested a standalone matchup adjustment built from historical defensive performance, and it did not improve predictions consistently out of sample.Matchup information is still reflected indirectly through our outside weekly projection and betting-market inputs — sportsbook odds and prediction markets — when available.We only show a separate factor when it adds reliable predictive value on its own. How to read
Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB83 - RB110 in the middle half, and RB67 - RB117 in the middle 80%.
Top 3: 0%Top 12: 0%Top 24: 0% 80% range: 0.5 - 2.8 |
1.5 | Across the simulated weeks at the position, he finishes in the top 3 0% of the time, 4th to 12th 0%, 13th to 24th 0%, and outside the top 24 100%. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB98 at the median, RB83 - RB110 in the middle half, and RB67 - RB117 in the middle 80%. | ||||
Simulated finishes
This board is ranked by projected fantasy points. The map shows where those same players finished at their own position across the 4,000 simulated weeks the projections came from.
Box: the middle half of a player's simulated finishes. Line: his median. Thin bar: the middle 80%. Two players whose boxes overlap are two players this board does not separate.
Week 9 RB outcome map: the positional finish each player reaches across the 4,000 simulated weeks, as a median, a middle half and a middle 80%. The board itself is ranked by projected fantasy points.
-
Tier 1 Jahmyr GibbsRB8Jahmyr Gibbs is in Tier 1 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB8 at the median, RB3 - RB18 in the middle half, and RB1 - RB31 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Christian McCaffreyRB13Christian McCaffrey is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB13 at the median, RB5 - RB26 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Kenneth Walker IIIRB11Kenneth Walker III is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB11 at the median, RB5 - RB23 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 2 Bijan RobinsonRB12Bijan Robinson is in Tier 2 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB12 at the median, RB6 - RB24 in the middle half, and RB2 - RB37 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 James Cook IIIRB15James Cook III is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Chuba HubbardRB15Chuba Hubbard is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB15 at the median, RB7 - RB28 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB42 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 D'Andre SwiftRB16D'Andre Swift is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB6 - RB29 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Kyren WilliamsRB17Kyren Williams is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB17 at the median, RB8 - RB31 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 3 Jonathan TaylorRB16Jonathan Taylor is in Tier 3 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB16 at the median, RB8 - RB30 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Chase BrownRB18Chase Brown is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB18 at the median, RB8 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB44 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Josh JacobsRB20Josh Jacobs is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB20 at the median, RB8 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB3 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Javonte WilliamsRB19Javonte Williams is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Bucky IrvingRB19Bucky Irving is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB9 - RB34 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB46 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 4 Ashton JeantyRB19Ashton Jeanty is in Tier 4 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB19 at the median, RB10 - RB32 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB43 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Breece HallRB24Breece Hall is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB11 - RB44 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Quinshon JudkinsRB22Quinshon Judkins is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB49 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Ollie Gordon IIRB22Ollie Gordon II is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB39 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Braelon AllenRB22Braelon Allen is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB36 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Rhamondre StevensonRB22Rhamondre Stevenson is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB37 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB47 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Derrick HenryRB22Derrick Henry is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB22 at the median, RB11 - RB38 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB50 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Jonah ColemanRB23Jonah Coleman is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB23 at the median, RB11 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB52 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 5 Cam SkatteboRB24Cam Skattebo is in Tier 5 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB24 at the median, RB11 - RB42 in the middle half, and RB4 - RB56 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Woody MarksRB25Woody Marks is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB25 at the median, RB13 - RB40 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB51 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 6 Saquon BarkleyRB29Saquon Barkley is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB29 at the median, RB14 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB61 in the middle 80%.
Show RB25 - RB36
-
Tier 6 Kyle MonangaiRB31Kyle Monangai is in Tier 6 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB31 at the median, RB15 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB6 - RB68 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Tyler AllgeierRB30Tyler Allgeier is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB30 at the median, RB16 - RB45 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB54 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Bhayshul TutenRB32Bhayshul Tuten is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB13 - RB129 in the middle half, and RB5 - RB129 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Rachaad WhiteRB32Rachaad White is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB17 - RB47 in the middle half, and RB8 - RB58 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Emanuel WilsonRB32Emanuel Wilson is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB32 at the median, RB18 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Alvin KamaraRB35Alvin Kamara is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB18 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB63 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Blake CorumRB34Blake Corum is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB19 - RB48 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Jadarian PriceRB34Jadarian Price is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB34 at the median, RB19 - RB50 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB62 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Zach CharbonnetRB36Zach Charbonnet is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB36 at the median, RB19 - RB54 in the middle half, and RB9 - RB67 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Aaron Jones Sr.RB35Aaron Jones Sr. is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB35 at the median, RB19 - RB49 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB59 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 7 Jordan MasonRB37Jordan Mason is in Tier 7 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB37 at the median, RB20 - RB52 in the middle half, and RB10 - RB65 in the middle 80%.
-
Tier 8 Omarion HamptonRB39Omarion Hampton is in Tier 8 on projected fantasy points. Across the simulated weeks he finishes RB39 at the median, RB22 - RB53 in the middle half, and RB12 - RB64 in the middle 80%.
Simulated positional finish. The scale is compressed to the right, so equal distances are not equal numbers of places.
The axis compresses lower-ranked finishes so the top of the board stays readable. Use the printed ranges for exact finish positions.
How these are made
This board was built from 2026 usage for 79% of the board, draft position for 99%, an outside projection for 55%, sportsbook props for 68%, an official status for 81%, over 4,000 simulated weeks. The projection and the odds are both unconditional: for a player carrying an official Questionable or Doubtful, the weeks he sits are in the average and in the odds. Ranks follow projected points for Full PPR, 1QB.
Availability is a model input: players ruled out, inactive, on a reserve list or without a game are left off the weekly board, and an official Questionable or Doubtful is simulated as playing 71% and 7% of the time. Status evidence was captured November 5, 2026 18:05 UTC. Model rankings-v1.5.2, board captured 2026-11-05.
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
