NE · Bye 11
Hunter Henry
LMD TE Tier 5 for Week 9 · 5.5 projected Standard points · TE20 rest of season
Questionable
Regular season
Week 9 and rest of season fantasy rankings
We project 5.5 points this week, TE Tier 5. The middle 80% of simulated scores runs 1.3 - 12.2 points. Top 3: 8% · Top 12: 26% · Top 24: 48% of simulated weeks. Listed questionable.
Week 9
TE Tier 5
5.2 - 5.9 projected points
Rest of season
TE20
127th by projected points
Projected
5.5
week 9, Standard
Top 12
26%
Top 3: 8% · Top 24: 48% at TE
Movement
↓ 4
TE11 in Week 8, TE15 now
Should you start Hunter Henry in Week 9?
Borderline
It is close. LMD ranks Hunter Henry TE15 for Week 9, just outside the TE12 starter line. He finishes inside TE12 in 26% of simulated weeks.
The starter line is a standard 12-team lineup's, and is the line LMD's weekly accuracy review grades this board against.
- Draft / market prior
- Neutral+0.03 pts
- Recent usage & efficiency
- No mean changeNarrower range+0.04 pts
- AvailabilityUnresolved injury
- No mean changeWider range0.00 pts
- Outside projection
- Slight positive+0.10 pts
- Betting markets
- No mean changeNarrower range+0.01 pts
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?
How to read
- Full model minus the model without each factor.
- Effects are not additive or changes in rank.
- Recent data includes its effect on blending weights.
- A range note means a factor moved the spread and not the expected points.
Standard scoring · Updated November 5, 2026
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
Updates
Recent updates
-
Hunter Henry not on practice field
Yahoo Sports ·
-
Patriots vs. Packers Wednesday injury report: Hunter Henry among four sidelined
Yahoo Sports ·
-
STATUS
Hunter Henry was listed as Questionable.
Let's Mock Draft ·
-
Hunter Henry injury update; Mike Vrabel’s halftime message helps lift Patriots to victory (Notes)
Yahoo Sports ·
-
If Hunter Henry misses time, Eli Raridon could play a bigger role, and other snap-count observations from Patriots-Dolphins
bostonglobe.com ·
Headlines from other publishers, discovered automatically and matched to Hunter Henry by name -- we did not write these and we do not host them, and each one opens at the publisher who did. Status changes are the club designation carried on our player data, not a report of our own.
Season performance
Performance vs. projection
Over 8 completed games Hunter Henry has averaged +0.7 points a game against what we projected before kickoff.
| Week | Opp | Proj | Actual | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | @ SEA | 3.6 | 2.6 | -1.0 |
| Wk 2 | vs PIT | 3.7 | 4.0 | +0.3 |
| Wk 3 | @ JAX | 5.4 | 0.5 | -4.9 |
| Wk 4 | @ BUF | 4.7 | 6.2 | +1.5 |
| Wk 5 | vs LV | 5.3 | 10.4 | +5.1 |
| Wk 6 | vs NYJ | 4.6 | 10.8 | +6.2 |
| Wk 7 | @ CHI | 5.2 | 7.1 | +1.9 |
| Wk 8 | @ MIA | 6.2 | 3.0 | -3.2 |
| Wk 9 | vs GB | 5.5 | — | — |
Each week's projection is the last one Let's Mock Draft published before that game kicked off, recorded at the time and never recalculated afterwards. The shaded band is the middle 80% of that week's simulated outcomes. Actual points are scored from official statistics under the scoring rule selected above.
Regular season
Why LMD has him here
We project 48.4 points this season, TE20. Top 3: 1% · Top 12: 22% · Top 24: 62% of simulated seasons. That is 5.3 a game over 9 remaining games. Listed questionable. Up 1 since the Nov. 4 board.
Per game
5.3 / game
Over 9 remaining game(s)
Finishing odds
Top 3: 1% · Top 12: 22% · Top 24: 62%
Share of simulated seasons finishing inside that place at TE
Market input
thin
Thin market coverage: few venues or markets priced this player.
LMD Rankings, rankings-v1.5.2. Inputs: Ball Don't Lie (fantasy market, player status, projections); PropLine (player props). · 2026 Rest of season board updated November 5, 2026
Dynasty
Long-term value
LMD's dynasty model has Hunter Henry #153 in 1QB and #150 in Superflex, TE18 at his position. Age 31.
1QB
#153
TE18 · tier 34 · of 300
Superflex
#150
TE18 · tier 27 · of 307
- Last season 148.8 pts 8.8 per game, half-PPR scoring, in the games he played.
- Availability 94% Share of his team's games he played over the seasons the model reads.
- History 3 seasons Seasons of production the model read; more history is weighed more confidently.
- Touches 5.3 / game Carries plus receptions per game; 18% of his team's targets.
LMD dynasty model 1.2.0: a 3-season projection from observed NFL statistics, priced above a lineup's replacement level. Our own ranking, not an ADP, a consensus or a market price. Updated October 2026.
Draft season Draft position and availability
ADP, draft range, availability at a pick and who goes around him, measured over 10,000 simulated 12-team Standard 1QB drafts.
Simulated draft position
Where he goes
Simulation average
10.04
pick 112.3 overall, averaged over every simulated draft
Median pick
10.03
half of simulations take him by pick 111
Draft range
8.12 - 11.10
the middle 80% of simulations (P10-P90)
Simulations
10,000
drafted in 9,988 of them
Filters
League format
Availability
Odds he reaches your pick
Available at 10.03 in 51% of simulations
Pick 111 overall in a 12-team draft · 10,000 simulations
From draft slot 10, the same seat picks again at 11.10, where he is available in 10% of simulations.
Slot 10's remaining turns: 10.03 51% · 11.10 10% · 12.03 5% · 13.10 1% · 14.03 <1% · 15.10 <1%
The middle half of simulations take him between 9.06 and 11.01.
| Pick | Available |
|---|---|
| 10.01 | 56% |
| 10.02 | 53% |
| 10.03 | 51% |
| 10.04 | 48% |
| 10.05 | 46% |
| 10.06 | 43% |
| 10.07 | 41% |
| 10.08 | 38% |
| 10.09 | 35% |
| 10.10 | 33% |
| 10.11 | 31% |
| 10.12 | 28% |
| 11.01 | 26% |
| 11.02 | 24% |
| 11.03 | 22% |
Distribution
Draft position distribution
| Pick | Share of simulations | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 8.12-9.01 | 5% | 484 of 10000 simulations |
| 9.02-9.03 | 5% | 467 of 10000 simulations |
| 9.04-9.05 | 5% | 542 of 10000 simulations |
| 9.06-9.07 | 6% | 581 of 10000 simulations |
| 9.08-9.09 | 6% | 560 of 10000 simulations |
| 9.10-9.11 | 6% | 577 of 10000 simulations |
| 9.12-10.01 | 6% | 550 of 10000 simulations |
| 10.02-10.03 | 5% | 515 of 10000 simulations |
| 10.04-10.05 | 5% | 507 of 10000 simulations |
| 10.06-10.07 | 5% | 531 of 10000 simulations |
| 10.08-10.09 | 5% | 479 of 10000 simulations |
| 10.10-10.11 | 5% | 491 of 10000 simulations |
| 10.12-11.01 | 4% | 435 of 10000 simulations |
| 11.02-11.03 | 4% | 408 of 10000 simulations |
| 11.04-11.05 | 3% | 349 of 10000 simulations |
| 11.06-11.07 | 3% | 342 of 10000 simulations |
| 11.08-11.09 | 2% | 248 of 10000 simulations |
| 11.10 | 1% | 126 of 10000 simulations |
Draft context
Who goes around him
Measured over the 9988 simulations in which Hunter Henry was drafted.
Usually taken just before
- George Kittle TE · SF 2%
- Kyle Pitts Sr. TE · ATL 2%
- Dallas Goedert TE · PHI 2%
- Oronde Gadsden II TE · LAC 2%
Usually taken just after
- Dallas Goedert TE · PHI 3%
- George Kittle TE · SF 3%
- Kyle Pitts Sr. TE · ATL 2%
- Mark Andrews TE · BAL 2%
Methodology
How this is measured
Every figure on this page comes from a Monte Carlo batch of 10,000 simulated 12-team Standard 1QB drafts, each one played out pick by pick by the same simulated managers that fill an empty seat in a live room.
Hunter Henry was selected in 9988 of those 10000 drafts. Every probability here rests on that count.
Each player's expected draft position starts from Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP as of November 5, 2026; the simulated managers move him from there. Players it does not price keep a price inferred from our own rankings.
A reach or a fall on this page is measured against Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP where it prices a player, and against a price inferred from our own rankings where it does not.
- Simulation model
- simulation-v1.2
- Generated
- November 5, 2026
- Player dataset
- nflverse-2026@c60914d598b9e57d
- Baseline
- mixed
- Market prior
- ADP data from Fantasy Football Calculator (2026-11-05)
Next
Draft it yourself
Draft against the same simulated managers that produced these numbers.
