TB · Bye 10
Cade Otton
LMD TE22 for Week 3 · 5.6 projected Half PPR points · TE22 rest of season
Regular season
Week 3 and rest of season fantasy rankings
We project 5.6 points this week, TE22. Top 3: 4% · Top 12: 20% · Top 24: 41% of simulated weeks. Up 7 since Week 2.
Week 3
TE22
138th by projected points
Rest of season
TE22
157th by projected points
Projected
5.6
week 3, Half PPR
Top 12
20%
Top 3: 4% · Top 24: 41% at TE
Movement
↑ 7
TE29 in Week 2, TE22 now
- Draft / market prior
- Strong negative-2.17 pts
- Recent usage & efficiency
- Positive+1.18 pts
- AvailabilityAvailable
- Neutral0.00 pts
- Outside projection
- Neutral+0.09 pts
- Betting markets
- No signal
Why isn’t matchup a separate factor?
How to read
- Full model minus the model without each factor.
- Effects are not additive or changes in rank.
- Recent data includes its effect on blending weights.
- A range note means a factor moved the spread and not the expected points.
Half PPR scoring · Updated September 22, 2026
LMD Rankings are produced by Let's Mock Draft's own statistical and market model. They are not analyst rankings: consensus boards are not an input, and nothing is edited by hand.
Season performance
Performance vs. projection
Over 2 completed games Cade Otton has averaged +1.7 points a game against what we projected before kickoff.
| Week | Opp | Proj | Actual | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | @ CIN | 3.0 | 4.1 | +1.1 |
| Wk 2 | vs CLE | 3.9 | 6.3 | +2.4 |
| Wk 3 | vs MIN | 5.6 | — | — |
Each week's projection is the last one Let's Mock Draft published before that game kicked off, recorded at the time and never recalculated afterwards. The shaded band is the middle 80% of that week's simulated outcomes. Actual points are scored from official statistics under the scoring rule selected above.
Regular season
Why LMD has him here
We project 80.5 points this season, TE22. Top 3: 0% · Top 12: 5% · Top 24: 52% of simulated seasons. That is 5.4 a game over 15 remaining games. Up 2 since the Sept. 20 board.
Per game
5.4 / game
Over 15 remaining game(s)
Finishing odds
Top 3: 0% · Top 12: 5% · Top 24: 52%
Share of simulated seasons finishing inside that place at TE
Market input
none
No market signal available.
LMD Rankings, rankings-v1.3.0. Inputs: Ball Don't Lie (fantasy market, player status, projections). · 2026 Rest of season board updated September 22, 2026
Dynasty
Long-term value
LMD's dynasty model has Cade Otton #187 in 1QB and #188 in Superflex, TE25 at his position. Age 27.
1QB
#187
TE25 · tier 42 · of 297
Superflex
#188
TE25 · tier 35 · of 303
- Last season 92.7 pts 6.2 per game, half-PPR scoring, in the games he played.
- Availability 89% Share of his team's games he played over the seasons the model reads.
- History 3 seasons Seasons of production the model read; more history is weighed more confidently.
- Touches 5.4 / game Carries plus receptions per game; 17% of his team's targets.
LMD dynasty model 1.2.0: a 3-season projection from observed NFL statistics, priced above a lineup's replacement level. Our own ranking, not an ADP, a consensus or a market price. Updated September 2026.
Draft season Draft position and availability
ADP, draft range, availability at a pick and who goes around him, measured over 10,000 simulated 12-team Half PPR 1QB drafts.
Simulated draft position
Where he goes
Simulation average
15.05
pick 172.7 overall, averaged over every simulated draft
Median pick
15.05
half of simulations take him by pick 173
Draft range
14.09 - 15.11
the middle 80% of simulations (P10-P90)
Simulations
10,000
drafted in 2,298 of them
Filters
League format
Availability
Odds he reaches your pick
Available at 15.05 in 90% of simulations
Pick 173 overall in a 12-team draft · 10,000 simulations
The middle half of simulations take him between 15.02 and 15.09.
| Pick | Available |
|---|---|
| 15.03 | 93% |
| 15.04 | 92% |
| 15.05 | 90% |
| 15.06 | 88% |
| 15.07 | 87% |
| 15.08 | 85% |
| 15.09 | 84% |
| 15.10 | 82% |
| 15.11 | 80% |
| 15.12 | 79% |
Distribution
Draft position distribution
| Pick | Share of simulations | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 14.09 | <1% | 51 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.10 | <1% | 52 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.11 | <1% | 47 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.12 | <1% | 54 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.01 | 1% | 121 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.02 | 1% | 129 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.03 | 2% | 157 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.04 | 2% | 157 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.05 | 2% | 188 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.06 | 2% | 163 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.07 | 2% | 153 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.08 | 2% | 162 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.09 | 2% | 160 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.10 | 2% | 180 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.11 | 1% | 147 of 10000 simulations |
Draft context
Who goes around him
Measured over the 2298 simulations in which Cade Otton was drafted.
Usually taken just before
- Jake Bates K · DET 5%
- Andy Borregales K · NE 4%
- Will Reichard K · MIN 3%
- Seattle Seahawks DST · SEA 3%
Usually taken just after
- Jake Bates K · DET 3%
- Seattle Seahawks DST · SEA 2%
- Jalen Coker WR · CAR 2%
- Deebo Samuel Sr. WR · SF 2%
Methodology
How this is measured
Every figure on this page comes from a Monte Carlo batch of 10,000 simulated 12-team Half PPR 1QB drafts, each one played out pick by pick by the same simulated managers that fill an empty seat in a live room.
Cade Otton was selected in 2298 of those 10000 drafts. Every probability here rests on that count.
Each player's expected draft position starts from Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP as of September 17, 2026; the simulated managers move him from there. Players it does not price keep a price inferred from our own rankings.
A reach or a fall on this page is measured against Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP where it prices a player, and against a price inferred from our own rankings where it does not.
- Simulation model
- simulation-v1.2
- Generated
- September 17, 2026
- Player dataset
- nflverse-2026@8a41b71bb222a352
- Baseline
- mixed
- Market prior
- ADP data from Fantasy Football Calculator (2026-09-17)
Next
Draft it yourself
Draft against the same simulated managers that produced these numbers.
