PIT · Bye 9
Chris Boswell
Chris Boswell comes off the board at 14.08 on average in 12-team Full PPR 1QB mock drafts, with a median of 14.08.
12-team Full PPR 1QB · 10,000 simulations · generated October 1, 2026
Updates
Recent updates
-
ADP UPDATE
Chris Boswell's ADP at Fantasy Football Calculator moved from 171.4 to 159.1 over the last 12 days.
Draft-position figures are measured, and name the market they came from.
Season performance
Performance vs. projection
Weekly performance vs. LMD projections will appear once games begin.
Each week's projection is the last one Let's Mock Draft published before that game kicked off, recorded at the time and never recalculated afterwards. The shaded band is the middle 80% of that week's simulated outcomes. Actual points are scored from official statistics under the scoring rule selected above.
Draft season Draft position and availability
ADP, draft range, availability at a pick and who goes around him, measured over 10,000 simulated 12-team Full PPR 1QB drafts.
Simulated draft position
Where he goes
Simulation average
14.08
pick 164.3 overall, averaged over every simulated draft
Median pick
14.08
half of simulations take him by pick 164
Draft range
14.02 - 15.05
the middle 80% of simulations (P10-P90)
Simulations
10,000
drafted in 9,516 of them
Filters
League format
Availability
Odds he reaches your pick
Available at 14.08 in 53% of simulations
Pick 164 overall in a 12-team draft · 10,000 simulations
From draft slot 5, the same seat picks again at 15.05, where he is available in 15% of simulations.
Slot 5's remaining turns: 14.08 53% · 15.05 15%
The middle half of simulations take him between 14.05 and 14.11.
| Pick | Available |
|---|---|
| 14.06 | 71% |
| 14.07 | 62% |
| 14.08 | 53% |
| 14.09 | 43% |
| 14.10 | 35% |
| 14.11 | 29% |
| 14.12 | 24% |
| 15.01 | 22% |
| 15.02 | 21% |
| 15.03 | 19% |
| 15.04 | 17% |
| 15.05 | 15% |
| 15.06 | 13% |
| 15.07 | 12% |
| 15.08 | 10% |
Distribution
Draft position distribution
| Pick | Share of simulations | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 14.02 | 4% | 420 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.03 | 5% | 476 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.04 | 5% | 512 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.05 | 7% | 698 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.06 | 9% | 884 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.07 | 9% | 944 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.08 | 9% | 928 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.09 | 8% | 810 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.10 | 6% | 648 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.11 | 5% | 482 of 10000 simulations |
| 14.12 | 2% | 230 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.01 | <1% | 83 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.02 | 2% | 197 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.03 | 2% | 214 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.04 | 2% | 180 of 10000 simulations |
| 15.05 | 2% | 163 of 10000 simulations |
Draft context
Who goes around him
Measured over the 9516 simulations in which Chris Boswell was drafted.
Usually taken just before
- Tyler Loop K · BAL 14%
- Harrison Mevis K · LAR 10%
- Andy Borregales K · NE 4%
- Green Bay Packers DST · GB 4%
Usually taken just after
- Andy Borregales K · NE 13%
- Jake Bates K · DET 6%
- Tyler Loop K · BAL 5%
- Green Bay Packers DST · GB 5%
Methodology
How this is measured
Every figure on this page comes from a Monte Carlo batch of 10,000 simulated 12-team Full PPR 1QB drafts, each one played out pick by pick by the same simulated managers that fill an empty seat in a live room.
Chris Boswell was selected in 9516 of those 10000 drafts. Every probability here rests on that count.
Each player's expected draft position starts from Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP as of October 1, 2026; the simulated managers move him from there. Players it does not price keep a price inferred from our own rankings.
A reach or a fall on this page is measured against Fantasy Football Calculator's aggregate ADP where it prices a player, and against a price inferred from our own rankings where it does not.
- Simulation model
- simulation-v1.2
- Generated
- October 1, 2026
- Player dataset
- nflverse-2026@8a41b71bb222a352
- Baseline
- mixed
- Market prior
- ADP data from Fantasy Football Calculator (2026-10-01)
Next
Draft it yourself
Draft against the same simulated managers that produced these numbers.